Literature DB >> 17275586

Critical reappraisal of Medical Research Council muscle testing for elbow flexion.

Michael C MacAvoy1, David P Green.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To critically evaluate the current standard for manually assessing strength both clinically and in the scientific literature: the 0-to-5 scale that evolved from the post-World War II report of the British Medical Research Council. Although widely used by surgeons and researchers, no physical analysis of its validity is available. With the elbow used as an example, a static physics experiment is devised to quantify the enormous difference between maximum strength (grade 5/5) and the strength needed to statically flex against gravity (grade 3/5).
METHODS: The weight, length, and center of gravity of 27 cadaver forearms were measured to determine the typical torque needed to flex the elbow against gravity. The result is expressed as a percentage of maximum strength, based on published data.
RESULTS: Estimated elbow strength needed to flex against gravity was 4% of the maximum strength at the elbow.
CONCLUSIONS: Of the 6 possible grades from 0 to 5, the single grade 4/5 represents more than 96% of potential elbow flexion strength. For elbow flexion, grade 4/5 includes both the very weak and the very strong. Grade 3/5 strength may be much weaker than is generally assumed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17275586     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2006.10.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Surg Am        ISSN: 0363-5023            Impact factor:   2.230


  9 in total

1.  Assessment of Motor Function in Peripheral Nerve Injury and Recovery.

Authors:  Albin John; Stephen Rossettie; John Rafael; Cameron Cox; Ivica Ducic; Brendan Mackay
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2022-09-13

2.  Modifying the Medical Research Council grading system through Rasch analyses.

Authors:  Els Karla Vanhoutte; Catharina Gerritdina Faber; Sonja Ingrid van Nes; Bart Casper Jacobs; Pieter Antoon van Doorn; Rinske van Koningsveld; David Reid Cornblath; Anneke Jelly van der Kooi; Elisabeth Aviva Cats; Leonard Hendrik van den Berg; Nicolette Claudia Notermans; Willem Lodewijk van der Pol; Mieke Catharina Elisabeth Hermans; Nadine Anna Maria Elisabeth van der Beek; Kenneth Craig Gorson; Marijke Eurelings; Jeroen Engelsman; Hendrik Boot; Ronaldus Jacobus Meijer; Giuseppe Lauria; Alan Tennant; Ingemar Sergio José Merkies
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  Reliability of the Q Force; a mobile instrument for measuring isometric quadriceps muscle strength.

Authors:  K W Douma; G R H Regterschot; W P Krijnen; G E C Slager; C P van der Schans; W Zijlstra
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2016-02-19

4.  Statistical measures of motor, sensory and cognitive performance across repeated robot-based testing.

Authors:  Leif E R Simmatis; Spencer Early; Kimberly D Moore; Simone Appaqaq; Stephen H Scott
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 4.262

5.  Ulnar and Median Fascicular Transfers for Elbow Flexion-Predicting Outcomes in a Heterogeneous Patient Group and Implications for Surgical Planning.

Authors:  Scott Ferris; William Alexander
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2020-12-04

Review 6.  Strategies for Peripheral Nerve Repair.

Authors:  Matthew Wilcox; Holly Gregory; Rebecca Powell; Tom J Quick; James B Phillips
Journal:  Curr Tissue Microenviron Rep       Date:  2020-04-21

7.  Volumetric MRI is a promising outcome measure of muscle reinnervation.

Authors:  Matthew Wilcox; Liane Dos Santos Canas; Rikin Hargunani; Tom Tidswell; Hazel Brown; Marc Modat; James B Phillips; Sebastien Ourselin; Tom Quick
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Motor grading of elbow flexion - is Medical Research Council grading good enough?

Authors:  Praveen Bhardwaj; Navin Bhardwaj
Journal:  J Brachial Plex Peripher Nerve Inj       Date:  2009-05-13

9.  Using 4+ to grade near-normal muscle strength does not improve agreement.

Authors:  Søren O'Neill; Sofie Louise Thomsen Jaszczak; Anne Katrine Søndergaard Steffensen; Birgit Debrabant
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2017-10-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.