Eman A Abahussain1, Douglas E Ball. 1. Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, Health Sciences Center, Kuwait University, PO Box 24923, Safat 13110, Kuwait.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To test the effectiveness of a simple educational intervention to encourage households to return unwanted medicines via a municipal collection program and to investigate the most common sources and types of unwanted medicines in the home. SETTING: Households in Kuwait City, Kuwait. METHOD: A convenience sample of 200 households in Kuwait received an educational letter and special plastic bags in which to place unwanted medicines to be collected by the municipality. They also completed a short self-administered questionnaire on medicine disposal habits. A second convenience sample of an additional 14 households in Kuwait received the same educational letter together with a face-to-face interview and assistance in collecting unwanted medicines. Returned medicines were categorized and their source and expiry dates noted. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Quantity and types of medicines returned. RESULTS: No medicines were collected from the 200 households participating in the municipal collection scheme in spite of 45% of respondents agreeing that this was an appropriate method of disposal. 97% of the respondents said they currently disposed of their medication in the garbage. The second intervention yielded 123 medicines from 14 homes, a third of which were for the respiratory system (38% of these were cough and cold preparations). The majority of returned medications were for acute conditions, almost all were from government health centers and 52% were expired. CONCLUSION: Simple collection of unwanted medicines by municipal authorities is unlikely to be effective. A multifaceted approach is more effective but resource intensive. Using local pharmacies as collection points in a reverse distribution system may be more cost-effective.
OBJECTIVE: To test the effectiveness of a simple educational intervention to encourage households to return unwanted medicines via a municipal collection program and to investigate the most common sources and types of unwanted medicines in the home. SETTING: Households in Kuwait City, Kuwait. METHOD: A convenience sample of 200 households in Kuwait received an educational letter and special plastic bags in which to place unwanted medicines to be collected by the municipality. They also completed a short self-administered questionnaire on medicine disposal habits. A second convenience sample of an additional 14 households in Kuwait received the same educational letter together with a face-to-face interview and assistance in collecting unwanted medicines. Returned medicines were categorized and their source and expiry dates noted. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Quantity and types of medicines returned. RESULTS: No medicines were collected from the 200 households participating in the municipal collection scheme in spite of 45% of respondents agreeing that this was an appropriate method of disposal. 97% of the respondents said they currently disposed of their medication in the garbage. The second intervention yielded 123 medicines from 14 homes, a third of which were for the respiratory system (38% of these were cough and cold preparations). The majority of returned medications were for acute conditions, almost all were from government health centers and 52% were expired. CONCLUSION: Simple collection of unwanted medicines by municipal authorities is unlikely to be effective. A multifaceted approach is more effective but resource intensive. Using local pharmacies as collection points in a reverse distribution system may be more cost-effective.
Authors: Paul E Stackelberg; Edward T Furlong; Michael T Meyer; Steven D Zaugg; Alden K Henderson; Dori B Reissman Journal: Sci Total Environ Date: 2004-08-15 Impact factor: 7.963
Authors: J M Grimshaw; R E Thomas; G MacLennan; C Fraser; C R Ramsay; L Vale; P Whitty; M P Eccles; L Matowe; L Shirran; M Wensing; R Dijkstra; C Donaldson Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Thomas G Bean; Ed Bergstrom; Jane Thomas-Oates; Amy Wolff; Peter Bartl; Bob Eaton; Alistair B A Boxall Journal: Environ Manage Date: 2016-06-24 Impact factor: 3.266