Literature DB >> 17273883

Evaluation of Margaria staircase test: the effect of body size.

Aleksandar Nedeljkovic1, Dragan M Mirkov, Nemanja Pazin, Slobodan Jaric.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the methodology of Margaria staircase test (MT) for assessment of muscle anaerobic power. Specifically, we hypothesized that due to the scaling effects the outcome of MT calculated using the standard formula that suggests the power output to be proportional to body mass [P = (m . g . h)/T; P = power output, m = body mass, g = 9.81 m/s(2), h = height of stairs climbed, T = running time] overestimates the effect of body size on the calculated muscle power output. Young and physically active subjects (N = 111) were tested and the relationship between P and body size (S; either body mass or height) was assessed by standard allometric model (i.e., P = a . S ( b ); where a and b were the constant multiplier and allometric parameter, respectively). The results supported the hypothesized relationship by revealing b = 0.66 (95%CI = 0.49-0.83; r = 0.59; P < 0.001) and b = 1.13 (95%CI = 0.49-0.83; r = 0.34; P < 0.001) for body mass and body height, respectively. The obtained values of b (i.e., b < 1 for body mass and b < 3 for body height) suggest that the standard formula of MT overestimates the power output of larger subjects and underestimates the power of smaller ones. Since the results were mainly in line with both the experimental findings and theoretical predictions regarding the general effects of scale on human muscle power, we propose a modified formula that provides normalized power: P ( n ) = P/m (0.67) = [(m . g . h)/T]/m (0.67) = (m (0.33) . g . h)/T. The modified formula could provide a body size independent index of muscle power that would both allow for establishing standards and enable comparison of individuals and groups of individuals of different body dimensions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17273883     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-007-0401-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.346


  17 in total

Review 1.  Role of body size in the relation between muscle strength and movement performance.

Authors:  Slobodan Jaric
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 6.230

2.  Movement performance and body size: the relationship for different groups of tests.

Authors:  Goran Markovic; Slobodan Jaric
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-03-16       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 3.  Normalizing physical performance tests for body size: a proposal for standardization.

Authors:  Slobodan Jaric; Dragan Mirkov; Goran Markovic
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 4.  Strength and power assessment. Issues, controversies and challenges.

Authors:  P Abernethy; G Wilson; P Logan
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 5.  The use of isometric tests of muscular function in athletic assessment.

Authors:  G J Wilson; A J Murphy
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 6.  Body composition in sport and exercise: directions for future research.

Authors:  J H Wilmore
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 5.411

7.  Measurement of muscular power (anaerobic) in man.

Authors:  R Margaria; P Aghemo; E Rovelli
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1966-09       Impact factor: 3.531

8.  Anaerobic power output of young obese men: comparison with non-obese men and the role of excess fat.

Authors:  K Kitagawa; M Suzuki; M Miyashita
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1980

Review 9.  Short-term muscle power during growth and maturation.

Authors:  Emmanuel Van Praagh; Eric Doré
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  Are adult physiques geometrically similar? The dangers of allometric scaling using body mass power laws.

Authors:  Alan M Nevill; Arthur D Stewart; Tim Olds; Roger Holder
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.868

View more
  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of alternating consecutive maximum contractions as an alternative test of neuromuscular function.

Authors:  Predrag R Bozic; Nemanja Pazin; Bobana Berjan; Slobodan Jaric
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Evaluation of novel tests of neuromuscular function based on brief muscle actions.

Authors:  Predrag R Bozic; Ozgur Celik; Mehmet Uygur; Christopher A Knight; Slobodan Jaric
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  AMPD1 rs17602729 is associated with physical performance of sprint and power in elite Lithuanian athletes.

Authors:  Valentina Ginevičienė; Audronė Jakaitienė; Aidas Pranculis; Kazys Milašius; Linas Tubelis; Algirdas Utkus
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 2.797

4.  Variants in the Myostatin Gene and Physical Performance Phenotype of Elite Athletes.

Authors:  Valentina Ginevičienė; Audronė Jakaitienė; Erinija Pranckevičienė; Kazys Milašius; Algirdas Utkus
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 4.096

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.