BACKGROUND: The following study was conducted to explore patients' information needs and preferences with a special focus on doctor-patient communication. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A 62-item questionnaire developed by a multidisciplinary team and validated in a phase-I study was given to breast cancer patients via the Internet (homepage) or in a hard copy version. RESULTS: A total of 617 patients responded, 552 on line and 65 via the hard copy questionnaire. The median age of the on-line group was 47 (21-85) and 55 (40-92) in the hard copy group. Sixty-five per cent of the patients were treated with the intention of achieving a cure and 35% of the patients had metastatic disease. The median length of the consultation communicating the information 'You have breast cancer' was 15 min (0-300). The most effective and patient-relevant source of information about the disease and the treatment options was consultation with the physician (84%). When asked to suggest areas for improvement, patients' most common answers were: more complementary therapies should be offered by the physician (54%); physicians should take more time to explain things (51%); and cooperation between the physicians involved in the patient's care should be improved (39%). The questions most relevant to patients were: 'Am I getting the right therapy?' (89%); 'How many patients with my condition does my doctor treat?' (46%) and 'Can I be enrolled into a trial?' (46%). An independent second opinion centre was desired by 94% of the respondents but only 20% knew of any such resource. CONCLUSIONS: This study underlines the need to give patients with breast cancer the full details on treatment options and cancer management. The results provide a suitable basis for a broader interdisciplinary discussion of the patient-physician relationship and should be useful in generating hypotheses for subsequent prospective studies.
BACKGROUND: The following study was conducted to explore patients' information needs and preferences with a special focus on doctor-patient communication. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A 62-item questionnaire developed by a multidisciplinary team and validated in a phase-I study was given to breast cancerpatients via the Internet (homepage) or in a hard copy version. RESULTS: A total of 617 patients responded, 552 on line and 65 via the hard copy questionnaire. The median age of the on-line group was 47 (21-85) and 55 (40-92) in the hard copy group. Sixty-five per cent of the patients were treated with the intention of achieving a cure and 35% of the patients had metastatic disease. The median length of the consultation communicating the information 'You have breast cancer' was 15 min (0-300). The most effective and patient-relevant source of information about the disease and the treatment options was consultation with the physician (84%). When asked to suggest areas for improvement, patients' most common answers were: more complementary therapies should be offered by the physician (54%); physicians should take more time to explain things (51%); and cooperation between the physicians involved in the patient's care should be improved (39%). The questions most relevant to patients were: 'Am I getting the right therapy?' (89%); 'How many patients with my condition does my doctor treat?' (46%) and 'Can I be enrolled into a trial?' (46%). An independent second opinion centre was desired by 94% of the respondents but only 20% knew of any such resource. CONCLUSIONS: This study underlines the need to give patients with breast cancer the full details on treatment options and cancer management. The results provide a suitable basis for a broader interdisciplinary discussion of the patient-physician relationship and should be useful in generating hypotheses for subsequent prospective studies.
Authors: Terry S Field; Jaclyn L F Bosco; Marianne N Prout; Heather T Gold; Sarah Cutrona; Pamala A Pawloski; Marianne Ulcickas Yood; Virginia P Quinn; Soe Soe Thwin; Rebecca A Silliman Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2011-10-19 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: C Keinki; E Seilacher; M Ebel; D Ruetters; I Kessler; J Stellamanns; I Rudolph; J Huebner Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Liora Shmueli; Nadav Davidovitch; Joseph S Pliskin; Ran D Balicer; Igal Hekselman; Geva Greenfield Journal: Isr J Health Policy Res Date: 2017-12-08
Authors: Sarah T Hawley; Nancy K Janz; Ann Hamilton; Jennifer J Griggs; Amy K Alderman; Mahasin Mujahid; Steven J Katz Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2008-11
Authors: Mark Hackbarth; Norbert Haas; Christina Fotopoulou; Werner Lichtenegger; Jalid Sehouli Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2007-08-07 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Mariëlle Ouwens; Rosella Hermens; Marlies Hulscher; Saskia Vonk-Okhuijsen; Vivianne Tjan-Heijnen; René Termeer; Henri Marres; Hub Wollersheim; Richard Grol Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2009-04-23 Impact factor: 3.603