Literature DB >> 17272589

Lifetime prevalence of learning disability among US children.

Maja Altarac1, Ekta Saroha.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to examine the lifetime prevalence of learning disability by sociodemographic and family-functioning characteristics in US children, with particular attention paid to the children with special health care needs.
METHODS: By using data from the National Survey of Children's Health, we calculated lifetime prevalence of learning disability using a question that asked whether a doctor or other health care or school professional ever told the survey respondent that the child had a learning disability. Children with and those without special health care needs were classified on the basis of how many of 5 definitional criteria for children with special health care needs they met (0-5). Bivariate and multivariate statistical methods were used to assess independent associations of selected sociodemographic and family variables with learning disability.
RESULTS: The lifetime prevalence of learning disability in US children is 9.7%. Although prevalence of learning disability is lower among average developing children (5.4%), it still affected 2.7 million children compared with 3.3 million (27.8%) children with special health care needs. As the number of definitional criteria children with special health care needs met increased from 1 to 5, so did the prevalence of learning disability (15.0%, 27.1%, 41.6%, 69.3%, and 87.8%, respectively). In the adjusted logistic regression model, in addition to the number of definitional criteria the children met, variables associated with the increased odd ratios of learning disability were lower education, all categories of poverty <300% of the federal poverty level, being male, increasing age, having a 2-parent stepfamily or other family structure, being adopted, presence of a smoker, respondent's higher responses on aggravation in parenting scale, sharing ideas with the child less than very well, and never, rarely, or sometimes discussing serious disagreements calmly.
CONCLUSIONS: Although more than half of lifetime prevalence of learning disability occurred in children with special health care needs, it is a significant morbidity in average-developing children as well. Learning disabilities represent important comorbidities among children with special health care needs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17272589     DOI: 10.1542/peds.2006-2089L

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  30 in total

Review 1.  Molecular and cellular mechanisms of learning disabilities: a focus on NF1.

Authors:  C Shilyansky; Y S Lee; A J Silva
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 12.449

2.  Academic achievement of children and adolescents with oral clefts.

Authors:  George L Wehby; Brent Collet; Sheila Barron; Paul A Romitti; Timothy N Ansley; Matthew Speltz
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Developmental Delays in Executive Function from 3 to 5 Years of Age Predict Kindergarten Academic Readiness.

Authors:  Michael T Willoughby; Brooke Magnus; Lynne Vernon-Feagans; Clancy B Blair
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  2016-01-11

4.  Neurofibromatosis Type 1 Implicates Ras Pathways in the Genetic Architecture of Neurodevelopmental Disorders.

Authors:  Jessica A Kaczorowski; Taylor F Smith; Amanda M Shrewsbury; Leah R Thomas; Valerie S Knopik; Maria T Acosta
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 2.805

5.  Minorities are Disproportionately Underrepresented in Special Education: Longitudinal Evidence Across Five Disability Conditions.

Authors:  Paul L Morgan; George Farkas; Marianne M Hillemeier; Richard Mattison; Steve Maczuga; Hui Li; Michael Cook
Journal:  Educ Res       Date:  2015-06-23

6.  A method for integrating neuroimaging into genetic models of learning performance.

Authors:  Chintan M Mehta; Jeffrey R Gruen; Heping Zhang
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 2.135

7.  A cross-sectional study to assess the prevalence of DSM-5 specific learning disorders in representative school samples from the second to sixth grade in Brazil.

Authors:  Isabela S Fortes; Cristiane S Paula; Melaine C Oliveira; Isabel A Bordin; Jair de Jesus Mari; Luis A Rohde
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 4.785

8.  Using Neuropsychometric Measurements in the Differential Diagnosis of Specific Learning Disability.

Authors:  Sevil Turgut Turan; Emel Erdoğan Bakar; Gülsen Erden; Sirel Karakaş
Journal:  Noro Psikiyatr Ars       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 1.339

9.  Cumulative social risk exposure, infant birth weight, and cognitive delay in infancy.

Authors:  Erika R Cheng; Julie Poehlmann-Tynan; John Mullahy; Whitney P Witt
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 3.107

10.  High parenting aggravation among US immigrant families.

Authors:  Stella M Yu; Gopal K Singh
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.