Literature DB >> 17270328

Investigation into the affect of cementing techniques on load transfer in the resurfaced femoral head: a multi-femur finite element analysis.

I A J Radcliffe1, M Taylor.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Femoral head resurfacing is a popular procedure for younger active hip replacement patients. Two major cementing techniques are used in femoral component fixation; producing varying cement mantle thicknesses. Each technique has benefits, but it is not known if cement mantle thickness is detrimental to load transfer within the proximal femur.
METHODS: This study uses computer tomography based finite element analysis to determine the effect of cement mantle thickness on strain in the resurfaced femoral head. A group of 16 femurs were investigated to take into account inter-patient variation; a factor often over-looked in such studies.
FINDINGS: Results showed strain in the proximal femoral head to decrease with increasing cement thickness, with a slight increase in strain in the posterior-superior neck. Cementing of the implant guide-pin produced marked reductions in strain in the head and neck except for the posterior-inferior neck; where it increased slightly.
INTERPRETATION: The study concluded that a thicker cement mantle increases strain shielding within the superior resurfaced femoral head; although short to medium term clinical trials do not suggest these factors to be of much concern. The analysis also found strain to increase around the inferior head-neck junction with a thinner mantle. Cementing the guide pin resulted in increased strain shielding whilst simultaneously shifting peak loads distally along the femoral neck. This work found that modelling a group of femurs was a useful tool for better interpreting the loading in the resurfaced femur.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17270328     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  11 in total

1.  Is the increase in bone mineral density after hip resurfacing uniform across the femoral neck?

Authors:  Ramprasad Kancherla; Arun Kannan; Rajesh Malhotra
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  2008 Otto Aufranc Award: component design and technique affect cement penetration in hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Paul E Beaulé; Wadih Y Matar; Philippe Poitras; Kevin Smit; Olivier May
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  [Reasons for failure of hip resurfacing implants. A failure analysis based on 250 revision specimens].

Authors:  M M Morlock; N Bishop; F Stahmer; J Zustin; G Sauter; M Hahn; M Krause; W Rüther; M Amling
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  The learning curve for adopting hip resurfacing among hip specialists.

Authors:  Ryan M Nunley; Jinjun Zhu; Peter J Brooks; C Anderson Engh; Stephen J Raterman; John S Rogerson; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Results of hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Francesco Falez; Fabio Favetti; Filippo Casella; Matteo Papalia; Gabriele Panegrossi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Bone mineral density of the femoral neck in resurfacing hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jeannette Østergaard Penny; Ole Ovesen; Kim Brixen; Jens-Erik Varmarken; Søren Overgaard
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.717

7.  Bone density of the femoral neck following Birmingham hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Nick J Cooke; Lauren Rodgers; David Rawlings; Andrew W McCaskie; James P Holland
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.717

8.  Region-of-interest analyses of one-dimensional biomechanical trajectories: bridging 0D and 1D theory, augmenting statistical power.

Authors:  Todd C Pataky; Mark A Robinson; Jos Vanrenterghem
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Biomechanical Property of a Newly Designed Assembly Locking Compression Plate: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Jiang-Jun Zhou; Min Zhao; Da Liu; Hai-Ying Liu; Cheng-Fei Du
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2017-06-18       Impact factor: 2.682

Review 10.  Hip Joint Stresses Due to Cam-Type Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Systematic Review of Finite Element Simulations.

Authors:  K C Geoffrey Ng; Mario Lamontagne; Michel R Labrosse; Paul E Beaulé
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.