Literature DB >> 17270218

The effect of static and dynamic spatially structured disturbances on a locally dispersing population.

David E Hiebeler1, Benjamin R Morin.   

Abstract

Previous models of locally dispersing populations have shown that in the presence of spatially structured fixed habitat heterogeneity, increasing local spatial autocorrelation in habitat generally has a beneficial effect on such populations, increasing equilibrium population density. It has also been shown that with large-scale disturbance events which simultaneously affect contiguous blocks of sites, increasing spatial autocorrelation in the disturbances has a harmful effect, decreasing equilibrium population density. Here, spatial population models are developed which include both of these spatially structured exogenous influences, to determine how they interact with each other and with the endogenously generated spatial structure produced by the population dynamics. The models show that when habitat is fragmented and disturbance occurs at large spatial scales, the population cannot persist no matter how large its birth rate, an effect not seen in previous simpler models of this type. The behavior of the model is also explored when the local autocorrelation of habitat heterogeneity and disturbance events are equal, i.e. the two effects occur at the same spatial scale. When this scale parameter is very small, habitat fragmentation prevents the population from persisting because sites attempting to reproduce will drop most of their offspring on unsuitable sites; when the parameter is very large, large-scale disturbance events drive the population to extinction. Population levels reach their maximum at intermediate values of the scale parameter, and the critical values in the model show that the population will persist most easily at these intermediate scales of spatial influences. The models are investigated via spatially explicit stochastic simulations, traditional (infinite-dispersal) and improved (local-dispersal) mean-field approximations, and pair approximations.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17270218     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.12.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  6 in total

1.  Coexistence of species with different dispersal across landscapes: a critical role of spatial correlation in disturbance.

Authors:  Jinbao Liao; Zhixia Ying; Daelyn A Woolnough; Adam D Miller; Zhenqing Li; Ivan Nijs
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Intense or spatially heterogeneous predation can select against prey dispersal.

Authors:  Frederic Barraquand; David J Murrell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Species extinction thresholds in the face of spatially correlated periodic disturbance.

Authors:  Jinbao Liao; Zhixia Ying; David E Hiebeler; Yeqiao Wang; Takenori Takada; Ivan Nijs
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Spatially-Correlated Risk in Nature Reserve Site Selection.

Authors:  Heidi J Albers; Gwenlyn M Busby; Bertrand Hamaide; Amy W Ando; Stephen Polasky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The stability of multitrophic communities under habitat loss.

Authors:  Chris McWilliams; Miguel Lurgi; Jose M Montoya; Alix Sauve; Daniel Montoya
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Five main phases of landscape degradation revealed by a dynamic mesoscale model analysing the splitting, shrinking, and disappearing of habitat patches.

Authors:  Ádám Kun; Beáta Oborny; Ulf Dieckmann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.