Literature DB >> 17268706

Passive or active smoking, which is more relevant to breast cancer.

Gholamhossein Sadri1, Hossein Mahjub.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the risk of breast cancer associated with passive and active smoking and to explore risk heterogeneity among studies.
METHODS: We conducted this study in Iran during the year 2006. Fifteen published studies on smoking and breast cancer met the defined criteria. Pooled odds ratio (OR) estimates for female breast cancer were calculated. The active and passive smokers were compared with women categorized as never regularly exposed to tobacco smoke.
RESULTS: The pooled risk estimate for breast cancer associated with passive smoking among non-smokers was 1.38 (95% confidence interval [CI]; 1.16-1.65). The pooled OR for active smokers was 1.25 (95% CI; 1.11-1.41). Also, the combined OR for passive and active smokers related to breast cancer was 1.30 (95% CI; 1.17-1.45).
CONCLUSION: Based on the results of the pooled analysis, it can be concluded both passive and active smoking equally increase the risk of female breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17268706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Saudi Med J        ISSN: 0379-5284            Impact factor:   1.484


  9 in total

1.  An ecological study of cancer incidence and mortality rates in France with respect to latitude, an index for vitamin D production.

Authors:  William B Grant
Journal:  Dermatoendocrinol       Date:  2010-04

2.  Smoking and Fibrocystic Changes in the Breast: A Case Report of a Lifelong Smoker and Changes in Breast Parenchyma.

Authors:  Dujanah S Bhatti; Muhammad Haseeb T Bokhari; Muhammad Adil A Khan
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-06-28

3.  Mesenchymal and stem-like cell properties targeted in suppression of chronically-induced breast cell carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Kusum Rathore; Hwa-Chain Robert Wang
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 8.679

4.  Effect of web-based messages on girls' knowledge and risk perceptions related to cigarette smoke and breast cancer: 6-month follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jennifer Schwartz; Joan L Bottorff; Pamela A Ratner; Carolyn Gotay; Kenneth C Johnson; Jasmina Memetovic; Chris G Richardson
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2014-09-30

5.  Can statistic adjustment of OR minimize the potential confounding bias for meta-analysis of case-control study? A secondary data analysis.

Authors:  Tianyi Liu; Xiaolu Nie; Zehao Wu; Ying Zhang; Guoshuang Feng; Siyu Cai; Yaqi Lv; Xiaoxia Peng
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 4.615

6.  Can statistical adjustment guided by causal inference improve the accuracy of effect estimation? A simulation and empirical research based on meta-analyses of case-control studies.

Authors:  Ruohua Yan; Tianyi Liu; Yaguang Peng; Xiaoxia Peng
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 2.796

7.  Global Trends in Death, Years of Life Lost, and Years Lived With Disability Caused by Breast Cancer Attributable to Secondhand Smoke From 1990 to 2019.

Authors:  Zejin Ou; Yunxia Gao; Diwei Jiang; Jiaxin Cui; Yixian Ren; Shihao Tang; Danping Duan; Danfeng Yu; Zhi Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Effect of Smoking on Breast Cancer by Adjusting for Smoking Misclassification Bias and Confounders Using a Probabilistic Bias Analysis Method.

Authors:  Reza Pakzad; Saharnaz Nedjat; Mehdi Yaseri; Hamid Salehiniya; Nasrin Mansournia; Maryam Nazemipour; Mohammad Ali Mansournia
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 4.790

Review 9.  The Health Effects of Passive Smoking: An Overview of Systematic Reviews Based on Observational Epidemiological Evidence.

Authors:  Shiyi Cao; Chen Yang; Yong Gan; Zuxun Lu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.