Literature DB >> 17267562

Selective visual attention to emotion.

Harald T Schupp1, Jessica Stockburger, Maurizio Codispoti, Markus Junghöfer, Almut I Weike, Alfons O Hamm.   

Abstract

Visual attention can be voluntarily directed toward stimuli and is attracted by stimuli that are emotionally significant. The present study explored the case when both processes coincide and attention is directed to emotional stimuli. Participants viewed a rapid and continuous stream of high-arousing erotica and mutilation stimuli as well as low-arousing control images. Each of the three stimulus categories served in separate runs as target or nontarget category. Event-related brain potential measures revealed that the interaction of attention and emotion varied for specific processing stages. The effects of attention and emotional significance operated additively during perceptual encoding indexed by negative-going potentials over posterior regions (approximately 200-350 ms after stimulus onset). In contrast, thought to reflect the process of stimulus evaluation, P3 target effects (approximately 400-600 ms after stimulus onset) were markedly augmented when erotica and mutilation compared with control stimuli were the focus of attention. Thus, emotion potentiated attention effects specifically during later stages of processing. These findings suggest to specify the interaction of attention and emotion in distinct processing stages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17267562      PMCID: PMC6673176          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3223-06.2007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  146 in total

1.  Increasing the accuracy of electromagnetic inverses using functional area source correlation constraints.

Authors:  Benoit R Cottereau; Justin M Ales; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Threat as a feature in visual semantic object memory.

Authors:  Clifford S Calley; Michael A Motes; H-Sheng Chiang; Virginia Buhl; Jeffrey S Spence; Hervé Abdi; Raksha Anand; Mandy Maguire; Leonardo Estevez; Richard Briggs; Thomas Freeman; Michael A Kraut; John Hart
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-03-25       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Does it make a difference if I have an eye contact with you or with your picture? An ERP study.

Authors:  Laura M Pönkänen; Annemari Alhoniemi; Jukka M Leppänen; Jari K Hietanen
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Reward expectation regulates brain responses to task-relevant and task-irrelevant emotional words: ERP evidence.

Authors:  Ping Wei; Di Wang; Liyan Ji
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Immediate memory consequences of the effect of emotion on attention to pictures.

Authors:  Deborah Talmi; Adam K Anderson; Lily Riggs; Jeremy B Caplan; Morris Moscovitch
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 6.  Affective picture processing: an integrative review of ERP findings.

Authors:  Jonas K Olofsson; Steven Nordin; Henrique Sequeira; John Polich
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2007-11-17       Impact factor: 3.251

7.  Time course and task dependence of emotion effects in word processing.

Authors:  Annekathrin Schacht; Werner Sommer
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Electrophysiological differences in the processing of affective information in words and pictures.

Authors:  José A Hinojosa; Luis Carretié; María A Valcárcel; Constantino Méndez-Bértolo; Miguel A Pozo
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  Using ERPs to investigate valence processing in the affect misattribution procedure.

Authors:  Curtis D Von Gunten; Bruce D Bartholow; Laura D Scherer
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Neurophysiological correlates of comprehending emotional meaning in context.

Authors:  Daphne J Holt; Spencer K Lynn; Gina R Kuperberg
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.