Literature DB >> 17267099

Photodynamic diagnostics and noninvasive bladder cancer: is it cost-effective in long-term application? A Germany-based cost analysis.

Maximilian Burger1, Dirk Zaak, Christian G Stief, Thomas Filbeck, Wolf-Ferdinand Wieland, Wolfgang Roessler, Stefan Denzinger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Noninvasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) causes an enormous economic burden to public health systems due to its life-long character and frequent recurrences. While white light (WL) cystoscopy is considered to be the gold standard for transurethral resection of the bladder, photodynamic diagnostic (PDD) has been shown to improve final outcome. Escalating healthcare costs warrant increased effectiveness in treating noninvasive UCB. No data based on assessment of costs have been published to date.
METHODS: A series of 301 patients with noninvasive UCB were randomized prospectively to standard WL or PDD transurethral resections of the bladder. Intravesical adjuvant therapy was administered as reflected in the appropriate guidelines. Expenditures of subsequent procedures and PDD-associated costs were assessed.
RESULTS: Median follow-up was 7.1 yr. Disease recurrence was found in 42% and 18% of WL and PDD patients, respectively (p=0.0003). In the WL group 2.0 and in the PDD group 0.8 transurethral resections of the bladder were noted per patient. In the WL group 1.0 and in the PDD group 0.3 recurring UCB occurred per patient, resulting in costs of 1750 euro per WL patient versus 420 euro per PDD patient in the follow-up period, respectively. Because a single expenditure of 135 euro was assessed for PDD, overall costs were significantly lower (by 1195 euro) in PDD patients. As the median follow-up was 7.1 yr, costs saved by PDD per patient per year were 168 euro.
CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that PDD significantly cut costs related to recurring UCB. Further studies are needed from an economic point of view.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17267099     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.01.064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  20 in total

1.  [Interdisciplinary networking for clinical and molecular questions in non-muscle invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder].

Authors:  S Denzinger; A Hartmann; F Hofstaedter; R Knuechel; P J Wild; D Zaak; C Stief; W F Wieland; R Stoehr; M Burger
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Photodynamic diagnostics of bladder tumors.

Authors:  Stefan Denzinger; Maximilian Burger
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Bladder cancer: narrowing the gap between evidence and practice.

Authors:  Maha H A Hussain; David P Wood; Dean F Bajorin; Bernard H Bochner; Robert Dreicer; Donald L Lamm; Michael A O'Donnell; Arlene O Siefker-Radtke; Dan Theodorescu; Colin P Dinney
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-10-26       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Current and future clinical applications for optical imaging of cancer: from intraoperative surgical guidance to cancer screening.

Authors:  Costas G Hadjipanayis; Huabei Jiang; David W Roberts; Lily Yang
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.929

5.  Hexaminolevulinate guided fluorescence cystoscopy reduces recurrence in patients with nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Arnulf Stenzl; Maximilian Burger; Yves Fradet; Lance A Mynderse; Mark S Soloway; J Alfred Witjes; Martin Kriegmair; Alexander Karl; Yu Shen; H Barton Grossman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Photodynamic diagnosis for superficial bladder cancer: do all risk-groups profit equally from oncological and economic long-term results?

Authors:  Wolfgang Otto; Maximilian Burger; Hans-Martin Fritsche; Andreas Blana; Wolfgang Roessler; Ruth Knuechel; Wolf F Wieland; Stefan Denzinger
Journal:  Clin Med Oncol       Date:  2009-04-30

7.  [Photodynamic diagnostics in the urinary tract. Consensus paper of the Working Group for Oncology of the German Society for Urology].

Authors:  A Stenzl; D Jocham; P Jichlinski; K Junker; F König; H van den Bergh; B Volkmer; D Zaak; J E Gschwend
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  [Diagnosis of urothelial carcinoma].

Authors:  A Karl; D Zaak; D Tilki; E Hungerhuber; M Staehler; S Denzinger; P Stanislaus; S Tritschler; F Strittmatter; C Stief; M Burger
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 9.  [Fluorescence cystoscopy at bladder cancer: present trials].

Authors:  D Zaak; A Karl; H Stepp; S Tritschler; D Tilki; M Burger; R Knuechel; C Stief
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 10.  The health economics of bladder cancer: an updated review of the published literature.

Authors:  Christina Yeung; Tuan Dinh; Joseph Lee
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.