Literature DB >> 17266971

Conversion of programmed-temperature retention indices from one set of conditions to another.

Chen-Xi Zhao1, Ting Zhang, Yi-Zeng Liang, Da-Lin Yuan, Ying-Xu Zeng, Qing-Song Xu.   

Abstract

In order to make programmed-temperature retention index (PTRI) data be shared by other chromatographers and laboratories, conversion of PTRI from one set of experimental conditions to another is investigated in detail in this work. It was found that the differences between the PTRIs at different heating rates are structurally dependent, especially the number of ring in molecules. Thus, with the help of molecule constitutional descriptors, equations of PTRI conversion to certain initial temperature, heating rate, and stationary phase were obtained with high correlation coefficients and low standard deviations. Calculation errors of PTRI conversion between different heating rates and between different initial temperatures were from 1.1 to 2.9 retention index units (i.u.), which is in the same order with experiment errors. It is well known that reproducibility of PTRI on a polar column is not as good as that on an apolar column because of the apolarity of the n-alkane homologues. Thus, topological descriptors were used for PTRI conversion between two columns with different polar stationary phases, giving better results than those obtained by constitutional descriptors. This shows that topological descriptors could provide more molecular structural information than constitutional descriptors. However, as constitutional descriptor has the advantages of clear physical meaning and very simple calculation, it is our first selection when the PTRI calculation accuracy is satisfied. The method developed is simple in calculation, easy to be performed with high accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17266971     DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2007.01.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chromatogr A        ISSN: 0021-9673            Impact factor:   4.759


  4 in total

1.  "Retention projection" enables reliable use of shared gas chromatographic retention data across laboratories, instruments, and methods.

Authors:  Brian B Barnes; Michael B Wilson; Peter W Carr; Mark F Vitha; Corey D Broeckling; Adam L Heuberger; Jessica Prenni; Gregory C Janis; Henry Corcoran; Nicholas H Snow; Shilpi Chopra; Ramkumar Dhandapani; Amanda Tawfall; Lloyd W Sumner; Paul G Boswell
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  A practical methodology to measure unbiased gas chromatographic retention factor vs. temperature relationships.

Authors:  Baijie Peng; Mei-Yi Kuo; Panhia Yang; Joshua T Hewitt; Paul G Boswell
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 4.759

3.  What experimental factors influence the accuracy of retention projections in gas chromatography-mass spectrometry?

Authors:  Michael B Wilson; Brian B Barnes; Paul G Boswell
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 4.759

4.  Easy and accurate calculation of programmed temperature gas chromatographic retention times by back-calculation of temperature and hold-up time profiles.

Authors:  Paul G Boswell; Peter W Carr; Jerry D Cohen; Adrian D Hegeman
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2012-09-23       Impact factor: 4.759

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.