| Literature DB >> 17266754 |
Ernesto Tappainer1, Vinicio Fiorani, Nicola Pederzolli, Jacopo Manfredi, Andrea Nocchi, Mario Zogno.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The sandwich double-patch technique was adopted as an alternative method for reconstruction of the left ventricle after excision of postinfarction dysfunctional myocardium to solve technical problems due to the thick edges of the ventricular wall.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2007 PMID: 17266754 PMCID: PMC1803783 DOI: 10.1186/1749-8090-2-10
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cardiothorac Surg ISSN: 1749-8090 Impact factor: 1.637
Preoperative characteristics
| Pt | Gender | Age | Symptoms | NY HA class | Vessel disease | Infarct-surgery delay | Thrombolysis | TIMI grade LAD | ACE inhib therapy | LV thrombus suspected | Viability test |
| 1 | F | 76 | A+D+Ar | 2 | 2 | 6 mo | No | 1 | Yes | Yes | Echo |
| 2 | F | 57 | A | 2 | 3 | 2 yr+2 mo | Yes | 0 | Yes | No | Spect-tc |
| 3 | M | 61 | None | - | 3 | 1 mo | Yes | 3 | Yes | No | Echo |
| 4 | M | 65 | D, Rf | 3 | 2 | 7 yr+5 mo | No | 1 | No | Yes | Echo |
| 5 | F | 68 | D | 3 | 3 | Silent | No | 0 | Yes | No | Echo |
| 6 | F | 71 | A+D | 2 | 2 | 3 yr | No | 0 | Yes | No | Spect-tc |
| 7 | F | 61 | Shock | 4 | 1 | 8 days | No | 0 | Yes | No | Echo |
| 8 | M | 75 | D | 3 | 3 | 3 mo | No | 0 | Yes | Yes | Spect-tc |
| 9 | M | 67 | A+E | 3 | 2 | Silent | No | 0 | Yes | Yes | Echo |
| 10 | F | 69 | D | 3 | 1 | 10 yr | No | 1 | Yes | No | Echo |
| 11 | M | 63 | A+E | 2 | 3 | 16 yr | Yes | 1 | Yes | Yes | Echo |
| 12 | F | 71 | D | 2 | 1 | Silent | No | 1 | Yes | No | Echo |
| mean ± sd | 67 ± 5.8 | 2.5 ± 0.8 | 40.5 mo ± 68.7 |
A: angina; D: dyspnea; Ar: arrhytmias; Rf: renal failure; E: embolism.
Figure 1Drawing of the two Dacron patches. During the closure, for each stitch the external patch acts as a pulley to attract the walls towards the centre of the resected area
Figure 2Patient n°3: antero-apical excision for akinesia without septal involvement. The thick cut surface is somewhat bleeding because the heart was beating
Figure 3Patient n°3: final aspect. Dotted circle: size of the remaining hole. Arrow: vein graft on the LAD artery (IMA was grafted on a large obtuse marginal branch).
Intra and postoperative data
| Pt N° | LVA type | Resected area (cm) | LV thrombosis | Septum treatment | N° Bypass | IMA graft on | Clamp time (min) | CPB time (min) | Ino tropes | Complications | ICU stay (days) | Hosp stay (days) |
| 1 | Dys | 6 × 5 | Yes | - | 2 | - | - | 123 | - | - | 1 | 6 |
| 2 | Aki | 6 × 5 | - | - | 2 | - | - | 124 | - | - | 1 | 7 |
| 3 | Aki | 5 × 4 | - | - | 3 | OM | 17 | 110 | - | - | 1 | 7 |
| 4 | Aki | 6 × 6 | - | Yes | 3 | - | - | 160 | - | preop Rf | 1 | 18 |
| 5 | Aki | 6 × 6 | - | Yes | 2 | - | 34 | 171 | - | L arm paresis | 1 | 5 |
| 6 | Aki | 5 × 4 | - | - | 2 | OM | 34 | 110 | - | - | 1 | 6 |
| 7 | Aki | 6 × 5 | Yes | - | - | - | - | 135 | - | preop shock | 3 | 17 |
| 8 | Dys | 7 × 6 | - | - | 3 | - | 56 | 140 | - | Bl, Pf, Rf | 25 | 30 |
| 9 | Dys | 8 × 8 | Yes | Yes | 2 | - | - | 134 | - | - | 1 | 6 |
| 10 | Dys | 8 × 5 | Yes | - | 1 | LAD | - | 129 | - | - | 1 | 6 |
| 11 | Dys | 8 × 6 | - | Yes | 5 | - | 82 | 178 | - | - | 1 | 11 |
| 12 | Dys | 7 × 6 | - | Yes | - | - | - | 76 | Dop | - | 1 | 7 |
| mean ± sd | 35.5 cm2 ± 12.1 | 2.5 ± 1.0 | 132.5 ± 28.2 | 3.16 ± 6.8 | 10.5 ± 7.5 |
IMA: internal mammary artery; Dys: dyskinesia; Aki: akinesia; Dop: dopamine; Bl: bleeding; Pf: pulmonary failure; Rf: renal failure. Clamp: for grafting or for IMA only.
Pre and post-operative LV volumes and EF
| Pt | BSA m2 | Nyha pre | Nyha post | ESV pre | ESV post | EDV pre | EDV post | EF% pre | EF% post | Follow up (m) |
| 1 | 1.7 | 2 | 1 | 102 | 59 | 170 | 119 | 40 | 50 | 60 |
| 2 | 1.7 | 2 | 2 | 72 | 53 | 132 | 112 | 45 | 52 | 51 |
| 3 | 1.8 | 1 | 1 | 74 | 41 | 136 | 84 | 46 | 51 | 48 |
| 4 | 1.8 | 3 | 1 | 106 | 78 | 162 | 130 | 34 | 40 | 48 |
| 5 | 1.8 | 3 | 2 | 83 | 58 | 151 | 102 | 45 | 43 | 47 |
| 6 | 1.8 | 2 | 1 | 106 | 69 | 163 | 126 | 35 | 45 | 43 |
| 7 | 1.7 | 4 | 1 | 82 | 57 | 128 | 134 | 36 | 57 | 30 |
| 8 | 1.7 | 3 | 1 | 95 | 54 | 167 | 129 | 43 | 58 | 27 |
| 9 | 1.7 | 3 | 1 | 101 | 53 | 168 | 119 | 39 | 55 | 15 |
| 10 | 1.9 | 3 | 2 | 100 | 59 | 159 | 123 | 37 | 52 | 13 |
| 11 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 105 | 55 | 175 | 100 | 40 | 45 | 12 |
| 12 | 1.5 | 2 | 1 | 97 | 57 | 176 | 105 | 44 | 46 | 9 |
| mean ± sd | 1.7 ± 0.1 | 2.5 ± 0.8 | 1.2 ± 0.4 | 93.5 ± 12.4 | 57.8 ± 8.9 | 157.2 ± 16.7 | 115.3 ± 14.9 | 40.3 ± 4.2 | 49.5 ± 5.7 | 34 ± 18 |
| P val | .001 | .001 | .001 | .001 |
Pre: preoperative, post: postoperative.
Figure 4Patient n°11: systolic shape at pre-post-operative angiography. A satisfactory conical shape was achieved after antero-septal excision and reconstruction by double-patch technique.