Literature DB >> 17266693

Colorectal cancer surveillance behaviors among members of typical and attenuated FAP families.

Anita Y Kinney1, Bret Hicken, Sara E Simonsen, Vickie Venne, Katrina Lowstuter, Jonathan Balzotti, Randall W Burt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Although enhanced colorectal surveillance is recommended for members of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) families, little is known about individual-level adherence behavior. This study examined factors associated with recent use of colorectal cancer (CRC) surveillance among FAP patients and their at-risk relatives.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study conducted a computer-assisted telephone survey among 150 members of 71 extended families with classic (FAP) or attenuated adenomatous polyposis (AFAP). Participants were enrolled in a university-based hereditary CRC registry or were first-degree relatives of enrollees. Both qualitative and quantitative data were collected and analyzed.
RESULTS: Surveillance behavior varied by disease status. Fifty-four percent of 71 participants with a personal history of FAP and 42% of 79 at-risk relatives reported recent use of CRC surveillance recommendations. In multiple logistic regression analysis, lack of patient recall of provider recommendation for an endoscopic examination of the colon (OR 4.8, 95% CI 1.8-13.1), lack of health insurance or no reimbursement for CRC surveillance (OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.2-10.5), and/or the belief that their relative risk of CRC is not increased (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.2-7.1) were independently associated with not having had a recent colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the known benefits of CRC surveillance, a substantial proportion of FAP family members did not have a recent colonoscopy or endoscopy. Interventions targeted at both clinicians and patients are needed to improve surveillance behavior. These data are also important in designing decision support tools to assist clinicians in identifying and managing high-risk patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17266693     DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00860.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  19 in total

Review 1.  Individual-level factors in colorectal cancer screening: a review of the literature on the relation of individual-level health behavior constructs and screening behavior.

Authors:  Marc T Kiviniemi; Alyssa Bennett; Marie Zaiter; James R Marshall
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 2.  When even people at high risk do not take up colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Uri Ladabaum
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Colorectal cancer screening among primary care patients: does risk affect screening behavior?

Authors:  Christina B Felsen; Alicja Piasecki; Jeanne M Ferrante; Pamela A Ohman-Strickland; Benjamin F Crabtree
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2011-08

4.  Telehealth personalized cancer risk communication to motivate colonoscopy in relatives of patients with colorectal cancer: the family CARE Randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Anita Y Kinney; Watcharaporn Boonyasiriwat; Scott T Walters; Lisa M Pappas; Antoinette M Stroup; Marc D Schwartz; Sandra L Edwards; Amy Rogers; Wendy K Kohlmann; Kenneth M Boucher; Sally W Vernon; Rebecca G Simmons; Jan T Lowery; Kristina Flores; Charles L Wiggins; Deirdre A Hill; Randall W Burt; Marc S Williams; John C Higginbotham
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Hereditary Colorectal Polyposis and Cancer Syndromes: A Primer on Diagnosis and Management.

Authors:  Priyanka Kanth; Jade Grimmett; Marjan Champine; Randall Burt; N Jewel Samadder
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  The Family Health Promotion Project (FHPP): design and baseline data from a randomized trial to increase colonoscopy screening in high risk families.

Authors:  Jan T Lowery; Al Marcus; Anita Kinney; Deborah Bowen; Dianne M Finkelstein; Nora Horick; Kathleen Garrett; Robert Haile; Robert Sandler; Dennis J Ahnen
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 2.226

7.  Bilingual approach to online cancer genetics education for Deaf American Sign Language users produces greater knowledge and confidence than English text only: A randomized study.

Authors:  Christina G S Palmer; Patrick Boudreault; Barbara A Berman; Alicia Wolfson; Lionel Duarte; Vickie L Venne; Janet S Sinsheimer
Journal:  Disabil Health J       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 2.554

8.  An unusual case of familial adenomatous polyposis with very early symptom occurrence.

Authors:  Maurizio Ponz de Leon; Maria Anastasia Bianchini; Luca Reggiani-Bonetti; Monica Pedroni; Carmela Di Gregorio; Alberto Merighi; Giuseppina Rossi; Giulia Magnani; Federica Domati; Alfredo Cacciari
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  Rectal and pouch recurrences after surgical treatment for familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  Fabio Guilherme Campos; Antonio Rocco Imperiale; Víctor Edmond Seid; Rodrigo Oliva Perez; Afonso Henrique da Silva e Sousa; Desidério Roberto Kiss; Angelita Habr-Gama; Ivan Cecconello
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Health behaviors in patients and families with hereditary colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Allison M Burton; Shelly R Hovick; Susan K Peterson
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2012-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.