Literature DB >> 17265391

Clostridium difficile-associated disease in Oregon: increasing incidence and hospital-level risk factors.

Rebecca E Chandler1, Katrina Hedberg, Paul R Cieslak.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The incidence of Clostridium difficile-associated disease (CDAD) appears to be increasing. Population-based estimates of disease have been limited, and analyses of hospital-level risk factors for CDAD are lacking. We sought to determine the incidence and trends of CDAD in Oregon and to identify hospital-level factors associated with increases in disease.
METHODS: We analyzed hospital discharge data to calculate the incidence and to describe trends of CDAD in Oregon from 1995 through 2002. We administered questionnaires to hospital laboratory directors, infection control practitioners, and pharmacists to determine the status of laboratory, infection control, and pharmacy policies over time.
RESULTS: The overall incidence of CDAD in Oregon was 3.5 case patients per 10,000 residents in 2002. Incidence increased from 1.4 to 3.3 cases per 1,000 hospital discharges from 1995 to 2002. Rates of disease increased most in hospitals with licensed bed capacity of more than 250 beds and more than 5 intensive care unit beds. Few laboratories, infection control practitioners, and pharmacists were able to identify changes in specific policies over the study period.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to determine a statewide population-based incidence of CDAD. Incidence of CDAD in Oregon has more than doubled over the past decade; larger hospitals experienced the greatest increase in disease rates. We did not identify hospital-level policies that could explain the increase. A study of patients with CDAD at the hospitals with the largest increases is underway to further identify risk factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17265391     DOI: 10.1086/511795

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol        ISSN: 0899-823X            Impact factor:   3.254


  6 in total

1.  Statin use and the risk of Clostridium difficile in academic medical centres.

Authors:  Christine Anne Motzkus-Feagans; Amy Pakyz; Ronald Polk; Giovanni Gambassi; Kate L Lapane
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Clostridium difficile infection worsens the prognosis of ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  María E Negrón; Herman W Barkema; Kevin Rioux; Jeroen De Buck; Sylvia Checkley; Marie-Claude Proulx; Alexandra Frolkis; Paul L Beck; Levinus A Dieleman; Remo Panaccione; Subrata Ghosh; Gilaad G Kaplan
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug

Review 3.  The changing epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infections.

Authors:  J Freeman; M P Bauer; S D Baines; J Corver; W N Fawley; B Goorhuis; E J Kuijper; M H Wilcox
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  A time-series analysis of clostridium difficile and its seasonal association with influenza.

Authors:  Philip M Polgreen; Ming Yang; Lucas C Bohnett; Joseph E Cavanaugh
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.254

Review 5.  Clostridium difficile PCR ribotype 027: assessing the risks of further worldwide spread.

Authors:  Archie C A Clements; Ricardo J Soares Magalhães; Andrew J Tatem; David L Paterson; Thomas V Riley
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 25.071

6.  Global burden of Clostridium difficile infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Evelyn Balsells; Ting Shi; Callum Leese; Iona Lyell; John Burrows; Camilla Wiuff; Harry Campbell; Moe H Kyaw; Harish Nair
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.413

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.