Literature DB >> 17264947

Appropriateness of diagnostic strategies for evaluating suspected venous thromboembolism.

Thomas Arnason1, Philip S Wells, Alan J Forster.   

Abstract

It was the objective of this study to determine the proportion of patients who undergo an appropriate diagnostic work-up following a D-dimer test performed to evaluate suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) or deep vein thrombosis (DVT). We performed a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary care hospital. We included patients if they underwent D-dimer testing between 2002 and 2005, if the D-dimer was performed for evaluation of VTE, and if the D-dimer test was successful. We classified: the patients' clinical probability of DVT or PE according to the Wells models, the imaging results, and the appropriateness of the testing algorithm. Of 1,000 randomly selected patients, 863 met our study criteria. Seven hundred nineteen patients (83%) had testing during an emergency department visit, while 144 were tested as inpatients (17%). Physicians performed the D-dimer test to evaluate DVT and PE in 238 (28%) and 625 (72%) patients, respectively. Overall, the testing strategy was appropriate in 69% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 66%-72%) of cases. The testing strategy was more likely to be appropriate for emergency department versus inpatients (75% vs. 39%, p < 0.05) and for DVT versus PE patients (84% vs. 63%, p < 0.05). Of all in-appropriately tested patients, under-utilization of diagnostic imaging was more common than over-utilization (90% vs. 10%, p < 0.05). VTE was confirmed in 37 of 138 'DVT patients' and 35 of 625 'PE patients' (16% [95% CI: 11%-21%] and 6% [95% CI: 4%-8%], respectively). In conclusion, physicians often fail to use diagnostic testing strategies for VTE correctly following a D-dimer test.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17264947

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 0340-6245            Impact factor:   5.249


  6 in total

Review 1.  Biochemical markers for the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism: the past, present and future.

Authors:  Giuseppe Lippi; Gianfranco Cervellin; Massimo Franchini; Emmanuel J Favaloro
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Point of care technology or standard laboratory service in an emergency department: is there a difference in time to action? A randomised trial.

Authors:  Christian B Mogensen; Anders Borch; Ivan Brandslund
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Ultrasound evaluation of central veinsin the intensive care unit:effects of dynamic manoeuvres.

Authors:  Santhi Samy Modeliar; Marie-Antoinette Sevestre; Bertrand de Cagny; Michel Slama
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Evaluation of the diagnostic management of deep vein thrombosis in the emergency department of a tertiary hospital in Santa Catarina, Brazil: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Lucas Tramujas; Márcio Mesquita Judice; Angela Bueno Becker
Journal:  J Vasc Bras       Date:  2022-10-03

5.  A bayesian approach to laboratory utilization management.

Authors:  Ronald G Hauser; Brian R Jackson; Brian H Shirts
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2015-02-24

6.  Order Indication Solicitation to Assess Clinical Laboratory Test Utilization: D-Dimer Order Patterns as an Illustrative Case.

Authors:  Joseph W Rudolf; Jason M Baron; Anand S Dighe
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2019-12-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.