PURPOSE: In 1996, we initiated the French multicenter phase III randomized trial to compare the effect on disease-free survival (DFS) of concurrent versus sequential chemotherapy (CT) and radiotherapy (RT) after breast-conserving surgery for stages I and II breast cancer. This report presents the clinical results with a median follow-up of 60 months. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between February 1996 and April 2000, 716 patients were entered onto this trial. Adjuvant treatment began within 6 weeks after surgery. Sequential treatment of CT administered first followed by RT was compared with concurrent treatment of CT administered with RT. The CT regimen consisted of mitoxantrone (12 mg/m2), fluorouracil (500 mg/m2), and cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2) on day 1, and it was repeated every 21 days for six courses. RT was delivered to the breast and, when indicated, to the regional lymphatics. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in treatment in the 5-year DFS (80% in both groups; P = .83), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS; 92% in sequential v 95% in concurrent; P = .76), metastasis-free survival (87% in sequential v 84% in concurrent; P = .55), or overall survival (90% in sequential v 91% in concurrent; P = .76). Nevertheless, in the node-positive subgroup, the 5-year LRFS was statistically better in the concurrent arm (97% in concurrent v 91% in sequential; P = .02), corresponding to a risk of locoregional recurrence decreased by 39% (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.93). CONCLUSION: This treatment protocol remains an appealing clinical option for many women with operable breast cancer at a high risk of recurrence. Combination treatments with new drugs for breast cancer are warranted.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: In 1996, we initiated the French multicenter phase III randomized trial to compare the effect on disease-free survival (DFS) of concurrent versus sequential chemotherapy (CT) and radiotherapy (RT) after breast-conserving surgery for stages I and II breast cancer. This report presents the clinical results with a median follow-up of 60 months. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between February 1996 and April 2000, 716 patients were entered onto this trial. Adjuvant treatment began within 6 weeks after surgery. Sequential treatment of CT administered first followed by RT was compared with concurrent treatment of CT administered with RT. The CT regimen consisted of mitoxantrone (12 mg/m2), fluorouracil (500 mg/m2), and cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2) on day 1, and it was repeated every 21 days for six courses. RT was delivered to the breast and, when indicated, to the regional lymphatics. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in treatment in the 5-year DFS (80% in both groups; P = .83), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS; 92% in sequential v 95% in concurrent; P = .76), metastasis-free survival (87% in sequential v 84% in concurrent; P = .55), or overall survival (90% in sequential v 91% in concurrent; P = .76). Nevertheless, in the node-positive subgroup, the 5-year LRFS was statistically better in the concurrent arm (97% in concurrent v 91% in sequential; P = .02), corresponding to a risk of locoregional recurrence decreased by 39% (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.93). CONCLUSION: This treatment protocol remains an appealing clinical option for many women with operable breast cancer at a high risk of recurrence. Combination treatments with new drugs for breast cancer are warranted.
Authors: Pelagia G Tsoutsou; Yazid Belkacemi; Joseph Gligorov; Abraham Kuten; Hamouda Boussen; Nuran Bese; Michael I Koukourakis Journal: Oncologist Date: 2010-11-01
Authors: L Livi; I Meattini; V Scotti; C Saieva; G Simontacchi; L Marrazzo; C Franzese; S Cassani; F Paiar; V Di Cataldo; J Nori; L Jose Sanchez; S Bianchi; L Cataliotti; G Biti Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2011-03-07 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Donna R Rivera; Patricia A Ganz; Meghan S Weyrich; Hanna Bandos; Joy Melnikow Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Maria C De Santis; Luigia Nardone; Barbara Diletto; Roberta Canna; Michela Dispinzieri; Lorenza Marino; Laura Lozza; Vincenzo Valentini Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2016-07-25 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: V Mandilaras; N Bouganim; J Spayne; R Dent; A Arnaout; J F Boileau; M Brackstone; S Meterissian; M Clemons Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 3.677
Authors: Rachel Yung; Roberta M Ray; Joshua Roth; Lisa Johnson; Greg Warnick; Garnet L Anderson; Candyce H Kroenke; Rowan T Chlebowski; Michael S Simon; Chunkit Fung; Kathy Pan; Di Wang; Wendy E Barrington; Kerryn W Reding Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2020-02-15 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Francesco Recchia; Giampiero Candeloro; Alisia Cesta; Mario DI Staso; Pierluigi Bonfili; Giovanni Luca Gravina; Ernesto DI Cesare; Stefano Necozione; Silvio Rea Journal: Mol Clin Oncol Date: 2014-03-21
Authors: Jason A Ellis; Johann Cooke; Rajinder P Singh-Moon; Mei Wang; Jeffrey N Bruce; Charles W Emala; Irving J Bigio; Shailendra Joshi Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2016-08-30 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Alberto Alvarado-Miranda; Oscar Arrieta; Carlos Gamboa-Vignolle; David Saavedra-Perez; Rafael Morales-Barrera; Enrique Bargallo-Rocha; Juan Zinser-Sierra; Victor Perez-Sanchez; Teresa Ramirez-Ugalde; Fernando Lara-Medina Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2009-07-11 Impact factor: 3.481