Literature DB >> 17264159

Efficacy and safety of oral phenylephrine: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Randy C Hatton1, Almut G Winterstein, Russell P McKelvey, Jonathan Shuster, Leslie Hendeles.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Oral phenylephrine is used as a decongestant, yet there has been no previously published systematic review supporting its efficacy and safety.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of oral phenylephrine as a nonprescription decongestant.
METHODS: MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, and the Federal Register were searched for English and non-English-language studies published through January 2007 that measured the effects of oral phenylephrine on nasal airway resistance (NAR) in patients with nasal congestion. The retrieved studies were supplemented with information from our personal files and by hand searches of the references in any of the studies. Additionally, a Web of Science Search was conducted using the Cited Reference function for all published clinical trials identified. Studies included in the analysis were randomized, placebo-controlled trials; studies of combination products were excluded. Two investigators independently extracted data on NAR, self-reported decongestant effects, and cardiovascular effects (ie, heart rate, blood pressure) from each of the included studies. Meta-analyses were performed for NAR and cardiovascular effects using a random effects model. Subjective decongestant effects were summarized.
RESULTS: Based on 8 unpublished studies that included 138 patients, phenylephrine 10 mg did not affect NAR more than placebo; the mean maximal difference in relative change from baseline between phenylephrine and placebo was 10.1% (95% CI -3.8% to 23.9%). Eight unpublished studies on phenylephrine 25 mg showed a significant reduction of maximal NAR compared with placebo of 27.6% (95% CI 17.5% to 37.7%). There was significant heterogeneity among the studies included in this analysis, which was partially attributable to different laboratories and methods used. Patient-reported decongestion was not consistently better for any phenylephrine dose compared with placebo, and NAR was a more sensitive measurement of efficacy. Phenylephrine showed no consistent effect on heart rate or blood pressure for doses of 25 mg or less.
CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence that oral phenylephrine is effective for nonprescription use as a decongestant. The Food and Drug Administration should require additional studies to show the safety and efficacy of phenylephrine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17264159     DOI: 10.1345/aph.1H679

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Pharmacother        ISSN: 1060-0280            Impact factor:   3.154


  11 in total

Review 1.  Comprehensive review of cardiovascular toxicity of drugs and related agents.

Authors:  Přemysl Mladěnka; Lenka Applová; Jiří Patočka; Vera Marisa Costa; Fernando Remiao; Jana Pourová; Aleš Mladěnka; Jana Karlíčková; Luděk Jahodář; Marie Vopršalová; Kurt J Varner; Martin Štěrba
Journal:  Med Res Rev       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 12.944

2.  Advocating for patients through clinical research.

Authors:  Leslie Hendeles
Journal:  J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2008-01

Review 3.  Prevention and treatment of the common cold: making sense of the evidence.

Authors:  G Michael Allan; Bruce Arroll
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Nonallergic rhinitis.

Authors:  Phil Lieberman; Debendra Pattanaik
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.806

5.  Increased bioavailability of phenylephrine by co-administration of acetaminophen: results of four open-label, crossover pharmacokinetic trials in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Hartley C Atkinson; Ioana Stanescu; Isam I Salem; Amanda L Potts; Brian J Anderson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Network neighbors of drug targets contribute to drug side-effect similarity.

Authors:  Lucas Brouwers; Murat Iskar; Georg Zeller; Vera van Noort; Peer Bork
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Willingness-to-accept pharmaceutical retail inconvenience: evidence from a contingent choice experiment.

Authors:  Keith Finlay; Charles Stoecker; Scott Cunningham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Evidence and evidence gaps in therapies of nasal obstruction and rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Nicole Rotter
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-12-15

9.  Facile Electrochemical Sensor for Sensitive and Selective Determination of Guaifenesin, Phenylephrine and Paracetamol on Electrochemically Pretreated Pencil Graphite Electrode.

Authors:  Mihaela Buleandră; Anca Aurelia Pătrașcu; Dana Elena Popa; Iulia Gabriela David; Irinel Adriana Badea; Anton Alexandru Ciucu
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 3.523

10.  Efficacy and safety of Reduqing granules in the treatment of common cold with wind-heat syndrome: a randomized, double-blind,zzm321990double-dummy, positive-controlled trial.

Authors:  Yanjiao Ma; Zhongyi Zhang; Lianbo Wei; Shuai He; Xun Deng; Aimin Ji; Benjie Zhou; Deqi Jiang; Mingxing Li; Yong Wang
Journal:  J Tradit Chin Med       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.547

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.