Literature DB >> 17263770

The International Classification of Headache Disorders revised criteria for chronic migraine—field testing in a headache specialty clinic.

M E Bigal1, A M Rapoport, F D Sheftell, S J Tepper, R B Lipton.   

Abstract

In the absence of a biological marker and expert consensus on the best approach to classify chronic migraine (CM), recent revised criteria for this disease has been proposed by the Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. This revised criteria for CM is now presented in the Appendix. Herein we field test the revised criteria for CM. We included individuals with transformed migraine with or without medication overuse (TM+ and TM–), according to the criteria proposed by Silberstein and Lipton, since this criterion has been largely used before the Second Edition of the International Classification of the Headache Disorders (ICHD-2). We assessed the proportion of subjects that fulfilled ICHD-2 criteria for CM or probable chronic migraine with probable medication overuse (CM+), as well as the revised ICHD-2 (ICHD-2R) criteria for CM (15 days of headache, 8 days of migraine or migraine-specific acute medication use—ergotamine or triptans). We also tested the ICHD-2R vs. three proposals. In proposal 1, CM/CM+ would require at least 15 days of migraine or probable migraine per month. Proposal 2 required 15 days of headache per month and at least 50% of these days were migraine or probable migraine. Proposal 3 required 15 days of headache and at least 8 days of migraine or probable migraine per month. Of the 158 patients with TM–, just 5.6% met ICHD-2 criteria for CM. According to the ICHD-2R, a total of 92.4% met criteria for CM (P < 0.001 vs. ICHD-2). The ICHD-2R criterion performed better than proposal 1 (47.8% of agreement, P < 0.01) and was not statistically different from proposals 2 (87.9%) and 3 (94.9%). Subjects with TM+ should be classified as medication overuse headache (MOH), and not CM+, according to the ICHD-2R. Nonetheless, we assessed the proportion of them who had 8 days of migraine per month. Of the 399 individuals with TM+, just 10.2% could be classified as CM+ in the ICHD-2. However, most (349, 86.9%) had 8 days of migraine per month and could be classified as MOH and probable CM in the ICHD-2R(P < 0.001 vs. ICHD-2). We conclude that the ICHD-2R addresses most of the criticism towards the ICHD-2 and should be adopted in clinical practice and research. In the population where use of specific acute migraine medications is less common, the agreement between ICHD-2R CM and TM may be less robust.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17263770     DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2006.01274.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cephalalgia        ISSN: 0333-1024            Impact factor:   6.292


  23 in total

Review 1.  Is idiopathic intracranial hypertension without papilledema a risk factor for migraine progression?

Authors:  Roberto De Simone; Angelo Ranieri; Chiara Fiorillo; Leonilda Bilo; Vincenzo Bonavita
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 2.  ICHD-3: what changes do we need regarding migraine?

Authors:  Gian Camillo Manzoni; Ilaria Grisendi; Paola Torelli
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2011-06

3.  Sinus venous stenosis-associated idiopathic intracranial hypertension without papilledema as a powerful risk factor for progression and refractoriness of headache.

Authors:  Roberto De Simone; Angelo Ranieri; Silvana Montella; Mario Marchese; Vincenzo Bonavita
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2012-06

Review 4.  Mechanism of chronic migraine.

Authors:  Sheena K Aurora; Arun Kulthia; Patricia M Barrodale
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2011-02

Review 5.  OnabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX®): a review of its use in the prophylaxis of headaches in adults with chronic migraine.

Authors:  James E Frampton
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Chronic migraine--classification, characteristics and treatment.

Authors:  Hans-Christoph Diener; David W Dodick; Peter J Goadsby; Richard B Lipton; Jes Olesen; Stephen D Silberstein
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 42.937

7.  Application of revised criteria for chronic migraine and medication overuse headache in a tertiary Headache Centre.

Authors:  Domenico D'Amico; Vincenzo Tullo; Alberto Proietti Cecchini; Susanna Usai; Eliana Mea; Gennaro Bussone
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 8.  Sinus problems as a cause of headache refractoriness and migraine chronification.

Authors:  Roger K Cady; Curtis P Schreiber
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2009-08

Review 9.  Behavioral therapy for chronic migraine.

Authors:  Francesca Pistoia; Simona Sacco; Antonio Carolei
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2013-01

Review 10.  The differential diagnosis of chronic daily headaches: an algorithm-based approach.

Authors:  Marcelo E Bigal; Richard B Lipton
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 7.277

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.