Literature DB >> 17263690

Differences in the diagnostic value of various criteria of negative T waves for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy based on a molecular genetic diagnosis.

Tetsuo Konno1, Noboru Fujino, Kenshi Hayashi, Katsuharu Uchiyama, Eiichi Masuta, Hiromasa Katoh, Yuichiro Sakamoto, Toshinari Tsubokawa, Hidekazu Ino, Masakazu Yamagishi.   

Abstract

Differences in the diagnostic value of a variety of definitions of negative T waves for HCM (hypertrophic cardiomyopathy) have not yet been clarified, resulting in a number of definitions being applied in previous studies. The aim of the present study was to determine the most accurate diagnostic definition of negative T waves for HCM in genotyped populations. Electrocardiographic and echocardiographic findings were analysed in 161 genotyped subjects (97 carriers and 64 non-carriers). We applied three different criteria that have been used in previous studies: Criterion 1, negative T wave >10 mm in depth in any leads; Criterion 2, negative T wave >3 mm in depth in at least two leads; and Criterion 3, negative T wave >1 mm in depth in at least two leads. Of the three criteria, Criterion 3 had the highest sensitivity (43% compared with 5 and 26% in Criterion 1 and Criterion 2 respectively; P<0.0001) and retained a specificity of 95%, resulting in the highest accuracy. In comparison with abnormal Q waves, negative T waves for Criterion 3 had a lower sensitivity in detecting carriers without LVH (left ventricular hypertrophy) (12.9% for negative T waves compared with 22.6% for abnormal Q waves). On the other hand, in detecting carriers with LVH, the sensitivity of negative T waves increased in a stepwise direction with the increasing extent of LVH (P<0.001), whereas there was less association between the sensitivity of abnormal Q waves and the extent of LVH. In conclusion, Criterion 3 for negative T waves may be the most accurate definition of HCM based on genetic diagnoses. Negative T waves may show different diagnostic value according to the different criteria and phenotypes in genotyped populations with HCM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17263690     DOI: 10.1042/CS20060293

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Sci (Lond)        ISSN: 0143-5221            Impact factor:   6.124


  4 in total

1.  Impact of T wave amplitude in lead aVR on predicting cardiac events in ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Tanaka; Tetsuo Konno; Yudai Tamura; Toyonobu Tsuda; Hiroshi Furusho; Masayuki Takamura; Kenji Sakata; Masakazu Yamagishi; Kenshi Hayashi
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 1.468

2.  The relationship between electrocardiographic changes and CMR features in asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Xiuyu Chen; Tao Zhao; Minjie Lu; Gang Yin; Wei Xiangli; Shiliang Jiang; Sanjay Prasad; Shihua Zhao
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 3.  Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Can the noninvasive diagnostic testing identify high risk patients?

Authors:  Li Zhang; Obinna Mmagu; Liwen Liu; Dayuan Li; Yuxin Fan; Adrian Baranchuk; Peter R Kowey
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2014-08-26

4.  Clinical disease presentation and ECG characteristics of LMNA mutation carriers.

Authors:  Laura Ollila; Kjell Nikus; Miia Holmström; Mikko Jalanko; Raija Jurkko; Maija Kaartinen; Juha Koskenvuo; Johanna Kuusisto; Satu Kärkkäinen; Eeva Palojoki; Eeva Reissell; Päivi Piirilä; Tiina Heliö
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2017-01-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.