Literature DB >> 17263112

Islands increase genetic subdivision and disrupt patterns of connectivity of intertidal snails in a complex archipelago.

Michael S Johnson1, Robert Black.   

Abstract

The view that marine species with planktonic dispersal have highly connected, demographically open populations is giving way to recognition that populations may often be largely self-recruiting, or demographically closed. This raises the question of what local conditions might favor isolation of populations. To test the importance of islands for local isolation in species with planktonic larvae, we examined allozyme variation among 35 populations of the intertidal snail Austrocochlea constricta in the Houtman Abrolhos Islands, Western Australia, spanning 60 km. Heterogeneity of allozyme frequencies among populations was high, with average F(ST) of 0.237, indicating highly localized populations. Increased subdivision was associated with islands at different scales: between island groups, separated by deep water gaps, and between disconnected sets of islands within groups. At short distances, up to two km, subdivision increased fivefold between islands compared with that between populations on the same island. Along 11 km of continuous, sheltered shore, there was isolation by distance but among a linear series of islands over similar distance, there was greater subdivision at short distances but no association with distance. These patterns had been seen previously in the direct-developing snail Bembicium vittatum, but its finding in A. constricta confirms for a planktonic disperser the importance of this complex archipelago for both retention of locally produced larvae and disruption of patterns of connectivity. Taken together, these results indicate that islands can increase both the "open" and the "closed" components of recruitment and that applicable models of genetic connectivity depend substantially on local conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17263112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  6 in total

1.  Environment drives high phylogenetic turnover among oceanic bacterial communities.

Authors:  Thomas Pommier; Emmanuel J P Douzery; David Mouillot
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Isolation by resistance across a complex coral reef seascape.

Authors:  Luke Thomas; W Jason Kennington; Michael Stat; Shaun P Wilkinson; Johnathan T Kool; Gary A Kendrick
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Review. Sympatric, parapatric or allopatric: the most important way to classify speciation?

Authors:  Roger K Butlin; Juan Galindo; John W Grahame
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-09-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Ocean currents help explain population genetic structure.

Authors:  Crow White; Kimberly A Selkoe; James Watson; David A Siegel; Danielle C Zacherl; Robert J Toonen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Subtle genetic structure reveals restricted connectivity among populations of a coral reef fish inhabiting remote atolls.

Authors:  Jim N Underwood; Michael J Travers; James P Gilmour
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Genetic traces of recent long-distance dispersal in a predominantly self-recruiting coral.

Authors:  Madeleine J H van Oppen; Adrian Lutz; Glenn De'ath; Lesa Peplow; Stuart Kininmonth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.