Literature DB >> 17262799

Impact of HPV testing, HPV vaccine development, and changing screening frequency on national Pap test volume: projections from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS).

Isam A Eltoum1, Janie Roberson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The frequently cited number of 50 million annual Papanicolaou cervical screening (Pap) tests performed in the US was based on the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) of the 1980s. Since then, monumental changes have occurred. More change will soon follow when primary human papilloma virus (HPV) testing and/or HPV vaccine delivery are fully accepted and implemented. The objectives of this study were 1) to estimate the total annual Pap tests performed in the US based on recent NHIS surveys, and 2) to estimate the potential change in the total annual Pap volume produced by changing demographics, reduced screening frequency, HPV testing, and the HPV vaccine.
METHODS: In the NHIS 2000 and NHIS 2005, women were asked to report the frequency of their Pap tests for the 6 years prior to the interview and to report whether they had abnormal findings. The authors analyzed the survey respondents answers to these questions by using SAS Survey Procedures (SAS Institute, NC). The results were stratified by age, and the total national volume was then extrapolated from a similarly stratified 2000 US census. The projected increase of total Pap tests for the next 25 years was determined by using the projected census data. Potential reductions of Pap tests performed secondarily to HPV testing of women >30 years old and of HPV vaccination were also determined.
RESULTS: Based on NHIS 2000 and NHIS 2005, 66 million (95% CI, 65-68) and 65 million (95% CI, 64-67) Pap tests were performed in the US, respectively. Had HPV testing been performed in women older than 30 years who had both negative HPV and negative 3-year Pap tests, then 30% (95% CI, 29-32%) of Pap tests would not have been performed. If both HPV testing and vaccination are performed, the total number of Pap tests performed annually is predicted to be reduced by 43% (95% CI, 35-38%).
CONCLUSIONS: Therefore, despite an expected increase in the population of women eligible for Pap tests, the total number will likely decrease substantially in the future. This, in turn, will decrease the demand for a traditionally trained cytotechnology workforce. (c) 2007 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17262799     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.22487

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  13 in total

1.  Use of electronic health record data to evaluate overuse of cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Jason S Mathias; Dana Gossett; David W Baker
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 2.  Expanded strain coverage for a highly successful public health tool: Prophylactic 9-valent human papillomavirus vaccine.

Authors:  Zhigang Zhang; Jun Zhang; Ningshao Xia; Qinjian Zhao
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus vaccination and cervical cancer screening in women older than 30 years in the United States.

Authors:  Jane J Kim; Jesse Ortendahl; Sue J Goldie
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Inefficiencies and High-Value Improvements in U.S. Cervical Cancer Screening Practice: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Authors:  Jane J Kim; Nicole G Campos; Stephen Sy; Emily A Burger; Jack Cuzick; Philip E Castle; William C Hunt; Alan Waxman; Cosette M Wheeler
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Preferences for human papillomavirus testing with routine cervical cancer screening in diverse older women.

Authors:  Alison J Huang; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable; Sue E Kim; Sabrina T Wong; Celia P Kaplan; Judith M E Walsh; A Yuri Iwaoka-Scott; George F Sawaya
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Perceptions of under and overutilization of cervical cancer screening services at Latino-serving community health centers.

Authors:  Gloria D Coronado; Amanda Petrik; Mark Spofford; Jocelyn Talbot; Huyen Hoai Do; Jennifer Sanchez; Tanya Kapka; Vicky Taylor
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2013-10

7.  Health and economic implications of HPV vaccination in the United States.

Authors:  Jane J Kim; Sue J Goldie
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Dual immunostaining of cervical cytology specimens with atypical squamous cells for p16/Ki-67 does not exclude the existence of a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.

Authors:  Yu-Jin Koo; Ho-Suap Hahn; In-Ho Lee; Kyung-Taek Lim; Ki-Heon Lee; Hye-Sun Kim; Tae-Jin Kim; Yi-Kyeong Chun; Hy-Sook Kim; Sung-Ran Hong
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 4.064

9.  Market survey predictions on the future of US Pap testing.

Authors:  R Marshall Austin; Barbara Benstein; Joel Bentz; Sandra Bigner; Gregory G Freund; Gregory La Rocco; Ibrahim Ramzy; Lynnette Savaloja; Vinod B Shidham
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 2.091

10.  Cost effectiveness analysis of including boys in a human papillomavirus vaccination programme in the United States.

Authors:  Jane J Kim; Sue J Goldie
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-10-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.