Literature DB >> 17262740

The surgical procedure and clinical results of subtotal stomach preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (SSPPD) in comparison with pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD).

Akira Hayashibe1, Masao Kameyama, Masaya Shinbo, Shinichiro Makimoto.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Subtotal stomach preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (SSPPD) is compared retrospectively with pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD).
METHODS: During 2002-2005, 21 patients (13 female, 8 male) underwent SSPPD. The mean age was 64.3 (range 33-80). PPPD was performed for 12 patients after 1999. Days of hospital stay, operation time, operative blood loss, postoperative morbidity and mortality, days of nasogastric intubation, days until liquid diet, delayed gastric emptying, postoperative change of serum Albumin value, were compared between SSPPD and PPPD. Clinical characteristics (age, gender, benign, or malignant condition, presence of preoperative jaundice, preoperative value of serum Albumin) were analyzed in both procedures.
RESULTS: In comparison of clinical characteristics, all factors were similar between PPPD and SSPPD. There were also quite similar results in days of hospital stay, operation time, operative blood loss, postoperative morbidity and mortality. Days of nasogastric intubation, days until liquid diet in PPPD were significantly longer than those in SSPPD and the incidence of delayed gastric emptying in PPPD was significantly higher than that in SSPPD. Finally, PPPD and SSPPD postoperative change of serum Albumin value were statistically similar.
CONCLUSIONS: We consider SSPPD as one of the most favorable procedures in patients who undergo pancreaticoduodenectomy. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17262740     DOI: 10.1002/jso.20608

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  28 in total

1.  Postoperative Changes in Body Composition After Pancreaticoduodenectomy Using Multifrequency Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis.

Authors:  Manabu Mikamori; Atsushi Miyamoto; Tadafumi Asaoka; Sakae Maeda; Naoki Hama; Kazuyoshi Yamamoto; Motohiro Hirao; Masataka Ikeda; Mitsugu Sekimoto; Yuichiro Doki; Masaki Mori; Shoji Nakamori
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  THE OBITUARY OF THE PYLORUS-PRESERVING PANCREATODUODENECTOMY.

Authors:  Orlando Jorge Martins Torres; Rodrigo Rodrigues Vasques; Camila Cristina S Torres
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

3.  Factors influencing clinically significant delayed gastric emptying after subtotal stomach-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Go Sato; Yoichi Ishizaki; Jiro Yoshimoto; Hiroyuki Sugo; Hiroshi Imamura; Seiji Kawasaki
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Prospective nonrandomized comparison between pylorus-preserving and subtotal stomach-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy from the perspectives of DGE occurrence and postoperative digestive functions.

Authors:  Emi Akizuki; Yasutoshi Kimura; Takayuki Nobuoka; Masafumi Imamura; Toshihiko Nishidate; Toru Mizuguchi; Tomohisa Furuhata; Koichi Hirata
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Analysis of risk factors for delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after 387 pancreaticoduodenectomies with usage of 70 stapled reconstructions.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Sakamoto; Yusuke Yamamoto; Shojiro Hata; Satoshi Nara; Minoru Esaki; Tsuyoshi Sano; Kazuaki Shimada; Tomoo Kosuge
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  Delayed Gastric Emptying After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Is Subtotal Stomach Preserving Better or Pylorus Preserving?

Authors:  Mena M Hanna; Mena Hanna; Rahul Gadde; Leonardo Tamariz; Casey J Allen; Casey Allen; Jonathan P Meizoso; Jonathan Meizoso; Danny Sleeman; Alan S Livingstone; Alan Livingstone; Danny Yakoub
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Reduction of the Incidence of Delayed Gastric Emptying in Side-to-Side Gastrojejunostomy in Subtotal Stomach-Preserving Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Toru Nakamura; Yoshiyasu Ambo; Takehiro Noji; Naoya Okada; Minoru Takada; Toru Shimizu; On Suzuki; Fumitaka Nakamura; Nobuichi Kashimura; Akihiro Kishida; Satoshi Hirano
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 8.  A case-matched comparison and meta-analysis comparing pylorus-resecting pancreaticoduodenectomy with pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy for the incidence of postoperative delayed gastric emptying.

Authors:  Yanming Zhou; Liang Lin; Lupeng Wu; Donghui Xu; Bin Li
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 3.647

9.  Randomized Trial of Pylorus-Preserving vs. Pylorus-Resecting Pancreatoduodenectomy: Long-Term Morbidity and Quality of Life.

Authors:  Ulla Klaiber; Pascal Probst; Felix J Hüttner; Thomas Bruckner; Oliver Strobel; Markus K Diener; André L Mihaljevic; Markus W Büchler; Thilo Hackert
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Prevention of delayed gastric emptying after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy with antecolic reconstruction, a long jejunal loop, and a jejuno-jejunostomy.

Authors:  S Cordesmeyer; S Lodde; K Zeden; I Kabar; M W Hoffmann
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.