Literature DB >> 17261748

Behavioral, temporal, and spatial targets for cellular transplants as adjuncts to rehabilitation for stroke.

Bruce H Dobkin1.   

Abstract

Stem cell and more differentiated neural cell transplantation strategies are an intriguing approach for neural repair to augment rehabilitation interventions after stroke. In the cortex, exogenous cells could create, augment, or extend in time endogenous peri-infarct and remote molecular signals, such as those for neurogenesis, cell differentiation, axonal and dendritic sprouting, network connectivity, and long-term potentiation, as well as deliver engineered genes and provide replacement cells in a network. If demyelinated axons exist in the periphery of an infarct, they could be targets for remyelination to reestablish conductivity. Much is unknown, however, about the mechanisms by which pluripotent embryonic and multipotent neural stem cells serve as agents of therapeutic plasticity. The robustness of their effects on neuromodulation, reorganization, regeneration, and behavioral recovery is a work in progress. Invasive interventions may have adverse effects not appreciated in preclinical testing. These should initially be offered only to patients with specific profound impairments after it is clinically certain that major disabilities will not improve. If a cellular strategy is very safe, it may be offered to subjects with moderate impairments when they are no longer likely to make further functional gains. Clinical trial designs are suggested that take into account the optimal timing after stroke and specific targets for cellular therapies to foster repair, remapping, and modulation of neural circuits. Cell-mediated rehabilitation would then use task-specific therapies in an optimal dose to maximize training-induced reorganization and learning and, most important, reduce unwanted disability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17261748     DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000248408.49398.9c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  7 in total

Review 1.  Confounders in rehabilitation trials of task-oriented training: lessons from the designs of the EXCITE and SCILT multicenter trials.

Authors:  Bruce H Dobkin
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 2.  Brain-computer interface technology as a tool to augment plasticity and outcomes for neurological rehabilitation.

Authors:  Bruce H Dobkin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-11-09       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Reorganization of Higher-Order Somatosensory Cortex After Sensory Loss from Hand in Squirrel Monkeys.

Authors:  Hui-Xin Qi; Chia-Chi Liao; Jamie L Reed; Jon H Kaas
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  What matters in cellular transplantation for spinal cord injury: the cells, the rehabilitation, or the best mix?

Authors:  Bruce H Dobkin
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 5.  Curiosity and cure: translational research strategies for neural repair-mediated rehabilitation.

Authors:  Bruce H Dobkin
Journal:  Dev Neurobiol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.964

Review 6.  Training and exercise to drive poststroke recovery.

Authors:  Bruce H Dobkin
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Neurol       Date:  2008-02

7.  Rewiring the ischaemic brain with human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cortical neurons.

Authors:  Stefano Pluchino; Luca Peruzzotti-Jametti
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 13.501

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.