Literature DB >> 17261742

Screening potential therapies: lessons learned from new paradigms used in Parkinson disease.

Barbara C Tilley1, Wendy R Galpern.   

Abstract

In Parkinson Disease (PD) as well as in stroke research there is an urgent need to both optimize the use of resources (number of patients, costs, and time) and select potential effective neuroprotective agents. The processes used to identify and study new therapies for PD may be applicable to the search for new therapies in stroke. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) organized the Committee to Identify Neuroprotective Agents for Parkinson's (CINAPS). CINAPS broadly solicited suggestions for agents and evaluated these agents using rigorous criteria. NINDS also created the NIH Exploratory Trials in PD program (NET-PD), a clinical network where CINAPS recommendations could be tested. Given multiple recommended agents, NET-PD investigators used Phase II futility designs with calibration controls, tested against an historical standard, to screen agents for testing in Phase III trials. Investigators also used the Phase II trial to assess ancillary outcome measures for use in Phase III. The observed value for the calibration controls in the first NET-PD Phase II trial was outside the 95% CI for the historical standard. Using bootstrap methodology it appeared unlikely this outcome happened by chance. The historical standard was updated using more contemporaneous data than were available at the start of the futility trials and a re-evaluation using the new threshold was conducted. Assessment of ancillary outcome measures led to a reduced set of outcome measures for use in Phase III. The CINAPS process, and lessons learned from NET-PD futility studies, particularly with respect to calibration controls and assessment of outcome measures, could enhance the choice and testing of new agents for stroke treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17261742     DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000255227.96365.37

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  7 in total

Review 1.  The promise of futility trials in neurological diseases.

Authors:  Marcus W Koch; Lawrence Korngut; David G Patry; Yahya Agha-Khani; Christopher White; Justyna R Sarna; Michael Yeung; V Wee Yong; Daniel Y C Heng; Gary Cutter; Luanne Metz
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 2.  Drug Repurposing in Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Dilan Athauda; Thomas Foltynie
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 5.749

3.  The futility study--Progress over the last decade.

Authors:  Bruce Levin
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  An Online Weight Loss Intervention for People With Obesity and Poorly Controlled Asthma.

Authors:  Olivia Johnson; Lynn B Gerald; Jean Harvey; Gem Roy; Heather Hazucha; Chelsey Large; Alyce Burke; Meredith McCormack; Robert A Wise; Janet T Holbrook; Anne E Dixon
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract       Date:  2022-03-15

Review 5.  Linked clinical trials--the development of new clinical learning studies in Parkinson's disease using screening of multiple prospective new treatments.

Authors:  Patrik Brundin; Roger A Barker; P Jeffrey Conn; Ted M Dawson; Karl Kieburtz; Andrew J Lees; Michael A Schwarzschild; Caroline M Tanner; Tom Isaacs; Joy Duffen; Helen Matthews; Richard K H Wyse
Journal:  J Parkinsons Dis       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 6.  The Disease Modification Conundrum in Parkinson's Disease: Failures and Hopes.

Authors:  Zoltan Mari; Tiago A Mestre
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 5.750

Review 7.  Is It Possible to Conduct a Multi-Arm Multi-Stage Platform Trial in Parkinson's Disease: Lessons Learned from Other Neurodegenerative Disorders and Cancer.

Authors:  Marie-Louise Zeissler; Vivien Li; Mahesh K B Parmar; Camille Buchholz Carroll
Journal:  J Parkinsons Dis       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 5.568

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.