Literature DB >> 17261539

Health risks of low photon energy imaging.

J L Redpath1.   

Abstract

The major health risk associated with low photon energy imaging is thought to be the induction of cancer as a consequence of the radiation exposure and this is the focus of this paper. Low photon energy imaging typically involves exposure to a low dose (<50 mGy) of low linear energy transfer (LET) radiation delivered at high dose-rate. Since epidemiologic data cannot provide an accurate assessment of risk at the doses used in imaging, risk estimates are currently made by fitting a linear response to intermediate and high dose data for cancer induction in radiation-exposed human populations. This method assumes a linear no-threshold (LNT) response and implies that no dose of radiation is safe. This assumption is not borne out by many laboratory studies of cancer-related endpoints that would suggest that the risk at low doses is much less than would be estimated from linear extrapolation from intermediate to high doses. It is also well recognised that the dose-response from many epidemiologic studies could equally well be fit by threshold models. Through the study of radiation-induced neoplastic transformation in vitro J-shaped dose-response curves for a variety of low LET radiations, including those used in low photon energy imaging, have been demonstrated. The relative risks calculated from this data compare remarkably well with those for breast cancer and leukemia incidence in radiation-exposed populations. From this it is concluded that the LNT hypothesis is likely to overestimate the risk of cancer induction by low photon energy imaging, at least for certain tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17261539     DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncl449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  7 in total

1.  Non-problematic risks from low-dose radiation-induced DNA damage clusters.

Authors:  Daniel P Hayes
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  A review: Development of a microdose model for analysis of adaptive response and bystander dose response behavior.

Authors:  Bobby E Leonard
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 2.658

3.  Human Lung Cancer Risks from Radon - Part II - Influence from Combined Adaptive Response and Bystander Effects - A Microdose Analysis.

Authors:  Bobby E Leonard; Richard E Thompson; Georgia C Beecher
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  "Protective bystander effects simulated with the state-vector model"--HeLa x skin exposure to Cs not protective bystander response but mammogram and diagnostic X-rays are.

Authors:  Bobby E Leonard
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 2.658

5.  Human Lung Cancer Risks from Radon - Part III - Evidence of Influence of Combined Bystander and Adaptive Response Effects on Radon Case-Control Studies - A Microdose Analysis.

Authors:  Bobby E Leonard; Richard E Thompson; Georgia C Beecher
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 6.  Are Risks From Medical Imaging Still too Small to Be Observed or Nonexistent?

Authors:  Brant A Ulsh
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 7.  The role of dose rate in radiation cancer risk: evaluating the effect of dose rate at the molecular, cellular and tissue levels using key events in critical pathways following exposure to low LET radiation.

Authors:  Antone L Brooks; David G Hoel; R Julian Preston
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 2.694

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.