Literature DB >> 17261142

Which spinal levels are identified by palpation of the iliac crests and the posterior superior iliac spines?

Robin Chakraverty1, Paul Pynsent, Karen Isaacs.   

Abstract

The line joining the superior aspect of the iliac crests posteriorly (the intercristal line) is commonly stated to cross the midline at the L4 or L4-5 spinal level on imaging. This study aimed to assess the spinal level identified through palpation of surface anatomy (iliac crests and posterior superior iliac spines) in adults and the level of agreement compared with the intercristal line identified through imaging. The study participants included consecutive adult patients undergoing prone fluoroscopically guided spinal injections for chronic low back pain at the Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, between April and July 2004. Prior to fluoroscopic imaging, each patient's surface anatomy was palpated by two examiners and lines created to form the palpated intercristal line and the posterior superior iliac spine line. Following imaging, the mid-line spinal levels identified by these palpated lines were recorded and the level of agreement (kappa coefficient) with the intercristal line formed by imaging of the iliac crests was assessed. The results showed that although the L4 or L4-5 spinal levels were identified on imaging of the intercristal line in 86.7% of 75 patients (49 female), the intercristal line formed through palpation tended to identify higher levels; the L3 or L3-4 spinal levels in 77.3% of cases and more commonly in females than in males (85.7 vs. 61.5%) and in patients with higher body mass indices. The level of agreement between the two lines was poor (kappa = 0.05). The posterior superior iliac spine line identified the S2 spinous process in 51% and the S1 in 44% of 60 (45 female) patients. The results suggest that formation of the intercristal line by palpation of the iliac crests identifies different spinal levels to those identified by imaging and that both methods should be regarded as different instruments. In the clinical situation, it may be more appropriate to consider that palpation of the intercristal line is a guide for identifying the L3 or L3-4 spinal levels rather than the L4 or L4-5 levels, particularly in females and patients with higher body mass indices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17261142      PMCID: PMC2100271          DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2006.00686.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anat        ISSN: 0021-8782            Impact factor:   2.610


  14 in total

1.  An evaluation of ultrasound imaging for identification of lumbar intervertebral level.

Authors:  G Furness; M P Reilly; S Kuchi
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.955

2.  Influence of lumbar flexion on the position of the intercrestal line.

Authors:  Jin-Tae Kim; Chul-Woo Jung; Jung-Rim Lee; Seong-Won Min; Jae-Hyon Bahk
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.288

3.  The tenth rib line as a new landmark of the lumbar vertebral level during spinal block.

Authors:  C-W Jung; J-H Bahk; J-H Lee; Y-J Lim
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.955

4.  Accuracy of placement of extradural needles in the L3-4 interspace: comparison of two methods of identifying L4.

Authors:  F A Ievins
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 9.166

5.  Jacoby's line rather than Tuffier's line as a guide to lumbar puncture.

Authors:  Y Kubota; Y Toyoda; H Kubota
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  The reproducibility of the iliac crest as a marker of lumbar spine level.

Authors:  C A Render
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 6.955

7.  The natural history of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  B E Fredrickson; D Baker; W J McHolick; H A Yuan; J P Lubicky
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Ability of anaesthetists to identify a marked lumbar interspace.

Authors:  C R Broadbent; W B Maxwell; R Ferrie; D J Wilson; M Gawne-Cain; R Russell
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.955

9.  Influence of age and sex on the position of the conus medullaris and Tuffier's line in adults.

Authors:  Jin-Tae Kim; Jae-Hyon Bahk; Joohon Sung
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.892

10.  Changes in anthropometric measures in men and women across the life-span: findings from the InCHIANTI study.

Authors:  Benedetta Bartali; Enrico Benvenuti; Anna Maria Corsi; Stefania Bandinelli; Cosimo Roberto Russo; Angelo Di Iorio; Fulvio Lauretani; Luigi Ferrucci
Journal:  Soz Praventivmed       Date:  2002
View more
  33 in total

1.  Bony landmarks in the sacral region: the posterior superior iliac spine and the second dorsal sacral foramina: a potential guide for sonography.

Authors:  Maurice Christopher McGrath; Mark David Stringer
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Reliability of Tuffier's line evaluated on cadaver specimens.

Authors:  Gunther Windisch; Heimo Ulz; Georg Feigl
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Validity of palpation of the C1 transverse process: comparison with a radiographic reference standard.

Authors:  Robert Cooperstein; Morgan Young; Makani Lew
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2015-06

4.  Would adopting a revised landmark rule for the spinal level of the iliac crests improve the accuracy of lumbar level identification?

Authors:  Robert Cooperstein; Felisha Truong
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2019-04

5.  The reliability of lumbar motion palpation using continuous analysis and confidence ratings: choosing a relevant index of agreement.

Authors:  Robert Cooperstein; Morgan Young
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2016-06

6.  Measurement of range of motions of L3-L4 healthy spine through offsetting reflective markers and in silico analysis of meshed model.

Authors:  G Kosalishkwaran; S Parasuraman; D Kingsly Jeba Singh; Elango Natarajan; I Elamvazuthi; John George
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 7.  The reliability of palpating the posterior superior iliac spine: a systematic review.

Authors:  Robert Cooperstein; Michael Hickey
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2016-03

8.  Safety of dry needling to the upper lumbar spine: a pilot cadaver study.

Authors:  C J Mansfield; M Harr; M Briggs; J Onate; L C Boucher
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2019-12-25

9.  Factors predictive of topographical accuracy in spine level localization.

Authors:  Jin W Tee; Joost Rutges; Travis Marion; John Street; Scott Paquette; Tamir Ailon; Brian K Kwon; Marcel Dvorak; Michael Boyd
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-03

10.  Radiological Evaluation of the Line Between the Crista Iliaca (Tuffier's line) in Elderly Patients.

Authors:  Burcu Özalp Horsanalı; Zeki Tuncel Tekgül; Murat Yaşar Özkalkanlı; Zehra Hilal Adıbelli; Özgür Esen; Fulya Yılmaz Duran
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2015-02-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.