Literature DB >> 17260133

Detection of manipulation in doping control urine sample collection: a multidisciplinary approach to determine identical urine samples.

Mario Thevis1, Hans Geyer, Ute Mareck, Gerd Sigmund, Jürgen Henke, Lotte Henke, Wilhelm Schänzer.   

Abstract

Manipulation of urine sampling in sports drug testing is considered a violation of anti-doping rules and is consequently sanctioned by regulatory authorities. In 2003, three identical urine specimens were provided by three different athletes, and the identity of all urine samples was detected and substantiated using numerous analytical strategies including gas chromatography-mass spectrometry with steroid and metabolite profiling, gas chromatography-nitrogen/phosphorus detector analysis, high-performance liquid chromatography-UV fingerprinting, and DNA-STR (short tandem repeat) analysis. None of the respective athletes was the donor of the urine provided for doping analysis, which proved to be a urine sample collected from other unidentified individual(s). Samples were considered suspicious based on identical steroid profiles, one of the most important parameters for specimen individualization in sports drug testing. A database containing 14,224 urinary steroid profiles of athletes was screened for specific values of 4 characteristic parameters (ratios of testosterone/epitestosterone, androsterone/etiocholanolone, androsterone/testosterone, and 5alpha-androstane-3alpha,17beta-diol/5beta-androstane-3alpha,17beta-diol) and only the three suspicious samples matched all criteria. Further metabolite profiling regarding indicated medications and high-performance liquid chromatography-UV fingerprinting substantiated the assumption of manipulation. DNA-STR analyses unequivocally confirmed that the 3 urine samples were from the same individual and not from the athletes who provided DNA from either buccal cell material or blood specimens. This supportive evidence led to punishment of all three athletes according to the rules of the World Anti-Doping Agency. Application of a new multidisciplinary strategy employing common and new doping control assays enables the detection of urine substitution in sports drug testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17260133     DOI: 10.1007/s00216-006-1112-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem        ISSN: 1618-2642            Impact factor:   4.142


  5 in total

1.  Metabolomic signatures in elite cyclists: differential characterization of a seeming normal endocrine status regarding three serum hormones.

Authors:  Boris Labrador; François-Xavier Lejeune; Alain Paris; Cécile Canlet; Jérôme Molina; Michel Guinot; Armand Mégret; Michel Rieu; Jean-Christophe Thalabard; Yves Le Bouc
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 4.290

2.  Does oral fluid contribute to exhaled breath samples collected by means of an electret membrane?

Authors:  Ann-Marie Garzinsky; Katja Walpurgis; Oliver Krug; Mario Thevis
Journal:  Drug Test Anal       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 3.345

3.  Genetic individual identification from dried urine spots: A complementary tool to drug monitoring and anti-doping testing.

Authors:  Pierangela Grignani; Alessandro Manfredi; Maria Cristina Monti; Matteo Moretti; Luca Morini; Silvia Damiana Visonà; Paolo Fattorini; Carlo Previderè
Journal:  Drug Test Anal       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 3.234

4.  Multiplexed Microsphere Suspension-Array Assay for Urine Mitochondrial DNA Typing by C-Stretch Length in Hypervariable Regions.

Authors:  Kimiko Aoki; Hiroyuki Tanaka; Takashi Kawahara
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2018-06-04

5.  Virtual drug testing: redefining sample collection in a global pandemic.

Authors:  Matthew N Fedoruk
Journal:  Bioanalysis       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 2.681

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.