Literature DB >> 17259581

Power, propensity to negotiate, and moving first in competitive interactions.

Joe C Magee1, Adam D Galinsky, Deborah H Gruenfeld.   

Abstract

Five experiments investigated how the possession and experience of power affects the initiation of competitive interaction. In Experiments 1a and 1b, high-power individuals displayed a greater propensity to initiate a negotiation than did low-power individuals. Three additional experiments showed that power increased the likelihood of making the first move in a variety of competitive interactions. In Experiment 2, participants who were semantically primed with power were nearly 4 times as likely as participants in a control condition to choose to make the opening arguments in a debate competition scenario. In Experiment 3, negotiators with strong alternatives to a negotiation were more than 3 times as likely to spontaneously express an intention to make the first offer compared to participants who lacked any alternatives. Experiment 4 showed that high-power negotiators were more likely than low-power negotiators to actually make the first offer and that making the first offer produced a bargaining advantage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17259581     DOI: 10.1177/0146167206294413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull        ISSN: 0146-1672


  10 in total

1.  The hormonal correlates of implicit power motivation.

Authors:  Steven J Stanton; Oliver C Schultheiss
Journal:  J Res Pers       Date:  2009-10-01

2.  What you see is what you get: webcam placement influences perception and social coordination.

Authors:  Laura E Thomas; Daniel Pemstein
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-03-19

3.  Mind the First Step: The Intrapersonal Effects of Affect on the Decision to Initiate Negotiations under Bargaining Power Asymmetry.

Authors:  Ilias Kapoutsis; Roger Volkema; Antonia Lampaki
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-08-02

4.  Using Self-regulation to Successfully Overcome the Negotiation Disadvantage of Low Power.

Authors:  Andreas Jäger; David D Loschelder; Malte Friese
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-03-14

5.  Predicting individual-level income from Facebook profiles.

Authors:  Sandra C Matz; Jochen I Menges; David J Stillwell; H Andrew Schwartz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  How Power Influences Decision-Makers' Investment Behavior in the Domains of Loss and Gain.

Authors:  Katarzyna Sekścińska; Joanna Rudzinska-Wojciechowska
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Power and variety-seeking: A compensatory perspective.

Authors:  Jin Wang; Fei Jin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-09-07

8.  Power Corrupts, but Control Does Not: What Stands Behind the Effects of Holding High Positions.

Authors:  Aleksandra Cislak; Aleksandra Cichocka; Adrian Dominik Wojcik; Natalia Frankowska
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2018-02-27

9.  In-Organization Ethics Power-Allocation Mechanisms and Members' Decision-Making Behavior.

Authors:  Yudan Pang; Xuefeng Wang; Hang Wu; Fanfan Zhang
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-28

10.  Extension request avoidance predicts greater time stress among women.

Authors:  Ashley V Whillans; Jaewon Yoon; Aurora Turek; Grant E Donnelly
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 11.205

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.