Literature DB >> 17259574

Challenging the courtesy bias interpretation of favorable clients' perceptions of family planning delivery.

Federico R León1, Rebecka Lundgren, Ana Huapaya, Irit Sinai, Victoria Jennings.   

Abstract

Favorable client perceptions of provider's interpersonal behavior in contraceptive delivery, documented in clinic exit questionnaires, appear to contradict results from qualitative evaluations and are attributed to clients' courtesy bias. In this study, trained simulated clients requested services from Ministry of Health providers in three countries. Providers excelled in courteousness/respect in Peru and Rwanda; in India, providers were less courteous and respectful when the simulated clients chose the pill. Privacy and two-way communication were less prevalent in all three countries. The findings challenge the courtesy bias interpretation. Global results from qualitative studies may have expressed the views of the minority of clients who are not treated well by providers.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17259574     DOI: 10.1177/0193841X06289044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eval Rev        ISSN: 0193-841X


  10 in total

1.  Accuracy of standard measures of family planning service quality: findings from the simulated client method.

Authors:  Katherine Tumlinson; Ilene S Speizer; Siân L Curtis; Brian W Pence
Journal:  Stud Fam Plann       Date:  2014-12

2.  "I Got What I Came for": A Qualitative Exploration into Family Planning Client Satisfaction in Dosso Region, Niger.

Authors:  Lisa M Calhoun; Amelia Maytan-Joneydi; Abdoul Moumouni Nouhou; Lenka Benova; Thérèse Delvaux; Thomas van den Akker; Balki Ibrahim Agali; Ilene S Speizer
Journal:  Open Access J Contracept       Date:  2022-07-12

3.  Women's views on consent, counseling and confidentiality in PMTCT: a mixed-methods study in four African countries.

Authors:  Anita Hardon; Eva Vernooij; Grace Bongololo-Mbera; Peter Cherutich; Alice Desclaux; David Kyaddondo; Odette Ky-Zerbo; Melissa Neuman; Rhoda Wanyenze; Carla Obermeyer
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  The role of the Standard Days Method in modern family planning services in developing countries.

Authors:  Rebecka I Lundgren; Mihira V Karra; Eileen A Yam
Journal:  Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care       Date:  2012-06-10       Impact factor: 1.848

5.  Simulated clients reveal programmatic factors that may influence contraceptive use in Kisumu, Kenya.

Authors:  Katherine Tumlinson; Ilene Speizer; Linda Archer; Frieda Behets
Journal:  Glob Health Sci Pract       Date:  2013-11-01

6.  Does group prenatal care affect satisfaction and prenatal care utilization in Iranian pregnant women?

Authors:  F Jafari; H Eftekhar; K Mohammad; A Fotouhi
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 1.429

7.  Does courtesy bias affect how clients report on objective and subjective measures of family planning service quality? A comparison between facility- and home-based interviews.

Authors:  Waqas Hameed; Muhammad Ishaque; Xaher Gul; Junaid-Ur-Rehman Siddiqui; Sharmeen Hussain; Wajahat Hussain; Aftab Ahmed; Asma Balal
Journal:  Open Access J Contracept       Date:  2018-05-03

8.  Client-provider interaction: understanding client experience with family planning service providers through the mystery client approach in India.

Authors:  Ankita Shukla; Rajib Acharya; Abhishek Kumar; Arupendra Mozumdar; Kumudha Aruldas; Niranjan Saggurti
Journal:  Sex Reprod Health Matters       Date:  2020-12

9.  Quality of family planning services for women of reproductive age in Lao PDR.

Authors:  Souksamone Thongmixay; Tess Schoneveld; Viengnakhone Vongxay; Jacqueline E W Broerse; Vanphanom Sychareun; Dirk R Essink
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 2.640

10.  Perspectives on implementing a quality improvement collaborative to improve person-centered care for maternal and reproductive health in Kenya.

Authors:  Katie Giessler; Avery Seefeld; Dominic Montagu; Beth Phillips; James Mwangi; Meghan Munson; Cathy Green; James Opot; Ginger Golub
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 2.038

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.