Literature DB >> 17259573

The efficacy of the Rio Hondo DUI court: a 2-year field experiment.

John M MacDonald1, Andrew R Morral, Barbara Raymond, Christine Eibner.   

Abstract

This study reports results from an evaluation of the experimental Rio Hondo driving under the influence (DUI) court of Los Angeles County, California. Interviews and official record checks with 284 research participants who were randomly assigned to a DUI court or a traditional criminal court were assessed at baseline and at 24-month follow-up. The interviews assessed the impact of the DUI court on self-reported drunk driving behavior, the completion of treatment, time spent in jail, alcohol use, and stressful life events. Official record checks assessed the impact of the DUI court on subsequent arrests for driving under the influence and other drinking-related behaviors. Few differences on any outcomes were observed between participants in the experimental DUI court and those assigned to the traditional court. The results suggest that the DUI court model had little additional therapeutic or public safety benefit over the traditional court process. The implication of these findings for the popularity of specialized courts for treating social problems is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17259573     DOI: 10.1177/0193841X06287189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eval Rev        ISSN: 0193-841X


  7 in total

1.  An Evaluation of Three Driving-Under-the-Influence Courts in Georgia.

Authors:  James C Fell; A Scott Tippetts; J Decarlo Ciccel
Journal:  Ann Adv Automot Med       Date:  2011

2.  Public health advocacy in the courts: opportunities for public health professionals.

Authors:  Jonathan N Kromm; Shannon Frattaroli; Jon S Vernick; Stephen P Teret
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  First-time DWI offenders are at risk of recidivating regardless of sanctions imposed.

Authors:  Eileen M Ahlin; Paul L Zador; William J Rauch; Jan M Howard; G Doug Duncan
Journal:  J Crim Justice       Date:  2011-03

4.  Effects of admission and treatment strategies of DWI courts on offender outcomes.

Authors:  Frank A Sloan; Lindsey M Chepke; Dontrell V Davis; Kofi Acquah; Phyllis Zold-Kilbourn
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2013-01-17

Review 5.  A systematic review of randomized controlled trials of interventions to improve the health of persons during imprisonment and in the year after release.

Authors:  Fiona G Kouyoumdjian; Kathryn E McIsaac; Jessica Liauw; Samantha Green; Fareen Karachiwalla; Winnie Siu; Kaite Burkholder; Ingrid Binswanger; Lori Kiefer; Stuart A Kinner; Mo Korchinski; Flora I Matheson; Pam Young; Stephen W Hwang
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  The effects of participation level on recidivism: a study of drug treatment courts using propensity score matching.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Gifford; Lindsey M Eldred; Sabrina A McCutchan; Frank A Sloan
Journal:  Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy       Date:  2014-09-24

7.  Individual-, family-, and school-level interventions targeting multiple risk behaviours in young people.

Authors:  Georgina MacArthur; Deborah M Caldwell; James Redmore; Sarah H Watkins; Ruth Kipping; James White; Catherine Chittleborough; Rebecca Langford; Vanessa Er; Raghu Lingam; Keryn Pasch; David Gunnell; Matthew Hickman; Rona Campbell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-10-05
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.