BACKGROUND AND AIMS: To date, there are no crop mutants described in the literature that display both Cd accumulation and tolerance. In the present study a unique pea (Pisum sativum) mutant SGECd(t) with increased Cd tolerance and accumulation was isolated and characterized. METHODS: Ethylmethane sulfonate mutagenesis of the pea line SGE was used to obtain the mutant. Screening for Cd-tolerant seedlings in the M2 generation was performed using hydroponics in the presence of 6 microm CdCl2. Hybridological analysis was used to identify the inheritance of the mutant phenotype. Several physiological and biochemical characteristics of SGECd(t) were studied in hydroponic experiments in the presence of 3 microm CdCl2, and elemental analysis was conducted. KEY RESULTS: The mutant SGECd(t) was characterized as having a monogenic inheritance and a recessive phenotype. It showed increased Cd concentrations in roots and shoots but no obvious morphological defects, demonstrating its capability to cope well with increased Cd levels in its tissues. The enhanced Cd accumulation in the mutant was accompanied by maintenance of homeostasis of shoot Ca, Mg, Zn and Mn contents, and root Ca and Mg contents. Through the application of La(+3) and the exclusion of Ca from the nutrient solution, maintenance of nutrient homeostasis in Cd-stressed SGECd(t) was shown to contribute to the increased Cd tolerance. Control plants of the mutant (i.e. no Cd treatment) had elevated concentrations of glutathione (GSH) in the roots. Through measurements of chitinase and guaiacol-dependent peroxidase activities, as well as proline and non-protein thiol (NPT) levels, it was shown that there were lower levels of Cd stress both in roots and shoots of SGECd(t). Accumulation of phytochelatins [(PCcalculated) = (NPT)-(GSH)] could be excluded as a cause of the increased Cd tolerance in the mutant. CONCLUSIONS: The SGECd(t) mutant represents a novel and unique model to study adaptation of plants to toxic heavy metal concentrations.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: To date, there are no crop mutants described in the literature that display both Cd accumulation and tolerance. In the present study a unique pea (Pisum sativum) mutant SGECd(t) with increased Cd tolerance and accumulation was isolated and characterized. METHODS:Ethylmethane sulfonate mutagenesis of the pea line SGE was used to obtain the mutant. Screening for Cd-tolerant seedlings in the M2 generation was performed using hydroponics in the presence of 6 microm CdCl2. Hybridological analysis was used to identify the inheritance of the mutant phenotype. Several physiological and biochemical characteristics of SGECd(t) were studied in hydroponic experiments in the presence of 3 microm CdCl2, and elemental analysis was conducted. KEY RESULTS: The mutant SGECd(t) was characterized as having a monogenic inheritance and a recessive phenotype. It showed increased Cd concentrations in roots and shoots but no obvious morphological defects, demonstrating its capability to cope well with increased Cd levels in its tissues. The enhanced Cd accumulation in the mutant was accompanied by maintenance of homeostasis of shoot Ca, Mg, Zn and Mn contents, and root Ca and Mg contents. Through the application of La(+3) and the exclusion of Ca from the nutrient solution, maintenance of nutrient homeostasis in Cd-stressed SGECd(t) was shown to contribute to the increased Cd tolerance. Control plants of the mutant (i.e. no Cd treatment) had elevated concentrations of glutathione (GSH) in the roots. Through measurements of chitinase and guaiacol-dependent peroxidase activities, as well as proline and non-protein thiol (NPT) levels, it was shown that there were lower levels of Cd stress both in roots and shoots of SGECd(t). Accumulation of phytochelatins [(PCcalculated) = (NPT)-(GSH)] could be excluded as a cause of the increased Cd tolerance in the mutant. CONCLUSIONS: The SGECd(t) mutant represents a novel and unique model to study adaptation of plants to toxic heavy metal concentrations.
Authors: María Rodríguez-Serrano; María C Romero-Puertas; Ana Zabalza; Francisco J Corpas; Manuel Gómez; Luis A Del Río; Luisa M Sandalio Journal: Plant Cell Environ Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 7.228
Authors: S B Ha; A P Smith; R Howden; W M Dietrich; S Bugg; M J O'Connell; P B Goldsbrough; C S Cobbett Journal: Plant Cell Date: 1999-06 Impact factor: 11.277
Authors: Andrey A Belimov; Ian C Dodd; Vera I Safronova; Nikita V Malkov; William J Davies; Igor A Tikhonovich Journal: J Exp Bot Date: 2015-02-17 Impact factor: 6.992
Authors: María Rodríguez-Serrano; María C Romero-Puertas; Diana M Pazmiño; Pilar S Testillano; María C Risueño; Luis A Del Río; Luisa M Sandalio Journal: Plant Physiol Date: 2009-03-11 Impact factor: 8.340
Authors: Natalia E Kichigina; Jan V Puhalsky; Aleksander I Shaposhnikov; Tatiana S Azarova; Natalia M Makarova; Svyatoslav I Loskutov; Vera I Safronova; Igor A Tikhonovich; Margarita A Vishnyakova; Elena V Semenova; Irina A Kosareva; Andrey A Belimov Journal: Physiol Mol Biol Plants Date: 2017-09-18
Authors: Elena E Fedorova; Teodoro Coba de la Peña; Victoria Lara-Dampier; Natalia A Trifonova; Olga Kulikova; José J Pueyo; M Mercedes Lucas Journal: J Exp Bot Date: 2021-02-24 Impact factor: 6.992
Authors: Elizaveta S Rudaya; Polina Yu Kozyulina; Olga A Pavlova; Alexandra V Dolgikh; Alexandra N Ivanova; Elena A Dolgikh Journal: Plants (Basel) Date: 2021-12-25
Authors: Viktor E Tsyganov; Anna V Tsyganova; Artemii P Gorshkov; Elena V Seliverstova; Viktoria E Kim; Elena P Chizhevskaya; Andrey A Belimov; Tatiana A Serova; Kira A Ivanova; Olga A Kulaeva; Pyotr G Kusakin; Anna B Kitaeva; Igor A Tikhonovich Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2020-01-29 Impact factor: 5.640