Literature DB >> 17258389

Prostate-specific antigen in clinical practice.

Stacy Loeb1, William J Catalona.   

Abstract

Currently, in the United States (US), most prostate cancers are diagnosed through screening with digital rectal examination (DRE) and measurement of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA). The serum PSA level correlates directly with prostate cancer risk and aggressiveness, as well as the outcomes after treatment. PSA testing is also useful in monitoring patients for tumor recurrence after treatment. PSA testing has limited specificity for prostate cancer detection, and its appropriate clinical application has been the topic of debate. Accordingly, several variations on the PSA measurement have emerged as useful adjuncts for prostate cancer screening. These take into consideration additional factors, such as the proportion of different PSA isoforms (free PSA, complexed PSA, pro-PSA and B PSA), the prostate volume (PSA density), and the rate of change in PSA levels over time (PSA velocity or PSA doubling time). Widespread PSA screening is associated with a 75% reduction in the proportion of men who present with metastatic disease since 1985-89 in the US and a 32.5% reduction in the age-adjusted prostate cancer mortality rate through 2003. The history and evidence underlying each of these parameters are reviewed in the following article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17258389     DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2006.12.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Lett        ISSN: 0304-3835            Impact factor:   8.679


  31 in total

1.  [Prostate biopsy - an unending story].

Authors:  G Mikuz
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.011

2.  Watchful waiting and quality of life among prostate cancer survivors in the Physicians' Health Study.

Authors:  Julie L Kasperzyk; William V Shappley; Stacey A Kenfield; Lorelei A Mucci; Tobias Kurth; Jing Ma; Meir J Stampfer; Martin G Sanda
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 3.  Inflammation and prostate cancer: friends or foe?

Authors:  Gianluigi Taverna; Elisa Pedretti; Giuseppe Di Caro; Elena Monica Borroni; Federica Marchesi; Fabio Grizzi
Journal:  Inflamm Res       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 4.575

4.  Decision analysis of dutasteride use for patients with negative prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Daniel D Sjoberg
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Prostate-specific antigen test result interpretation when combined with risk factors for recommendation of biopsy: a survey of urologist's practice patterns.

Authors:  Nathan Lawrentschuk; Nikhil Daljeet; Clement Ma; Karen Hersey; Alexandre Zlotta; Neil Fleshner
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-06-12       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 6.  Recurrent gene fusions in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Chandan Kumar-Sinha; Scott A Tomlins; Arul M Chinnaiyan
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 60.716

7.  Analysis of serum total and free PSA using immunoaffinity depletion coupled to SRM: correlation with clinical immunoassay tests.

Authors:  Tao Liu; Mahmud Hossain; Athena A Schepmoes; Thomas L Fillmore; Lori J Sokoll; Scott R Kronewitter; Grant Izmirlian; Tujin Shi; Wei-Jun Qian; Robin J Leach; Ian M Thompson; Daniel W Chan; Richard D Smith; Jacob Kagan; Sudhir Srivastava; Karin D Rodland; David G Camp
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 8.  Screening for prostate cancer: an update.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Peter T Scardino; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.344

9.  Has blood volume an impact on serum PSA levels?

Authors:  Anton Ponholzer; Christian Temml; Stephan Madersbacher
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Clinical utility of prostate carcinoma molecular diagnostic tests.

Authors:  Scott B Shappell
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2008
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.