Literature DB >> 17258340

Quality of interstitial PDR-brachytherapy-implants of head-and-neck-cancers: predictive factors for local control and late toxicity?

Winfrid J Melzner1, Michael Lotter, Rolf Sauer, Vratislav Strnad.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Parameters and indices related to the implant geometry in use for describing the quality of volume implants in interstitial brachytherapy were developed on the basis of LDR-brachytherapy. The aim of our study was to evaluate their usefulness for predicting late toxicity and local control in the PDR-brachytherapy of head-and-neck-tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2000 and October 2004, 210 patients were treated with PDR-brachytherapy which was administered either postoperatively or as definitive treatment. Brachytherapy was used as sole treatment in some cases while in others a combination with EBRT was used. For assessment of quality of implants we analyzed the following indices and parameters using the univariate chi2 test and multivariate logistic regression analysis: V85, V120 and V150 (volume enclosed by the surface of the 85%-, 120%- and 150%-isodose), UI (uniformity index), QI (quality index), HI (homogeneity index), VGR (volume gradient ratio), DNR (dose non-uniformity ratio), LD (low dose), HD (high dose), PD (peak dose) and the intersource spacing.
RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 24 months (4-50) the rate of - usually transient - soft tissue necrosis (STN) was 11%, osteoradionecrosis (ORN) was seen in 7.6% of cases and local relapse occurred in 7% of cases. Univariate analysis shows a significant influence on the development of soft tissue necrosis for V85, and on osteoradionecrosis for HD and PD. In the multivariate analysis a correlation between soft tissue necrosis and QI was found. For local control a correlation with QI, VGR and minimal tube distance was found using univariate analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Using interstitial PDR-brachytherapy in head-and-neck-tumors the probability of local control and of the development of soft tissue necrosis or osteoradionecrosis is dependent on dose and volume parameter like the volume of the reference isodose, the high and peak dose values, on the homogeneity of the dose distribution, quantified by the quality index or the volume gradient ratio as well on the minimal tube distance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17258340     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2006.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  10 in total

1.  [Brachytherapy for the treatment of head and neck cancer].

Authors:  J E Meyer; C Brocks; S Maune; V Strnad; J A Werner; B Wollenberg; G Kovács
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Comparison of intensity-modulated radiotherapy, adaptive radiotherapy, proton radiotherapy, and adaptive proton radiotherapy for treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Charles B Simone; David Ly; Tu D Dan; John Ondos; Holly Ning; Arnaud Belard; John O'Connell; Robert W Miller; Nicole L Simone
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 3.  The role of brachytherapy in the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Authors:  Małgorzata Wierzbicka; Anna Bartochowska; Vratislav Strnad; Primož Strojan; William M Mendenhall; Louis B Harrison; Alessandra Rinaldo; Puja Sahai; Susanne Wiegand; Alfio Ferlito
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Reirradiation for recurrent head and neck cancer with salvage interstitial pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy: Long-term results.

Authors:  Vratislav Strnad; Michael Lotter; Stephan Kreppner; Rainer Fietkau
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2015-01-10       Impact factor: 3.621

5.  Brachytherapy in head and neck malignancies: Indian Brachytherapy Society (IBS) recommendations and guidelines.

Authors:  Rajendra Bhalavat; Ashwini Budrukkar; Sarbani Ghosh Laskar; Dayanand Sharma; Ashutosh Mukherji; Manish Chandra; Umesh Mahantshetty; Vibhay Pareek; Pratibha Bauskar; Sonali Saraf
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2020-10-30

Review 6.  Modern head and neck brachytherapy: from radium towards intensity modulated interventional brachytherapy.

Authors:  György Kovács
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2014-12-31

7.  Pulsed dose rate brachytherapy as the boost in combination with external beam irradiation in base of tongue cancer. Long-term results from a uniform clinical series.

Authors:  Bengt Johansson; Leif Karlsson; Johan Reizenstein; Mathias von Beckerath; Lennart Hardell; Jan Persliden
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2011-03-31

8.  Results of sole postoperative interstitial, high-dose-rate brachytherapy of T1-2 tongue tumours.

Authors:  Zoltán Takácsi-Nagy; Örs Ferenczi; Tibor Major; Hironori Akiyama; Georgina Fröhlich; Ferenc Oberna; Mónika Révész; Márton Poósz; Csaba Polgár
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Dose volume uniformity index: a simple tool for treatment plan evaluation in brachytherapy.

Authors:  Ramachandran Prabhakar
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2010-07-06

10.  Second-line treatment of recurrent HNSCC: tumor debulking in combination with high-dose-rate brachytherapy and a simultaneous cetuximab-paclitaxel protocol.

Authors:  M Ritter; I U Teudt; J E Meyer; U Schröder; G Kovács; B Wollenberg
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 3.481

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.