Literature DB >> 17257530

Arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis for symptomatic osteoarthritis of the hindfoot: a prospective study of 41 cases.

Michael Christoph Glanzmann1, Roberto Sanhueza-Hernandez.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This prospective study evaluated the results of arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis for painful hindfoot osteoarthritis.
METHODS: The hypotheses were that (1) the arthroscopic technique results in a reliable fusion rate, (2) the clinical outcome is better than the open procedure and (3) complication rates are lower. Forty-one arthroscopic subtalar fusions were done in 37 consecutive symptomatic patients without hindfoot deformity between December, 1997, and May, 2003. Indications for fusion were persistent pain with reduced range of motion and impaired daily activities.
RESULTS: The average modified AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score improved from 53 (range 22 to 69) points preoperatively to 84 (range 41 to 94) points at final follow-up (average 55 months, range 24 to 89 months). Union was achieved in all cases. Radiographic progression of degeneration in the adjacent joints was observed in three patients.
CONCLUSIONS: In painful hindfoot osteoarthritis the arthroscopic technique provides reliable fusion and high patient satisfaction with the advantages of a minimally invasive procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17257530     DOI: 10.3113/FAI.2007.0001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  9 in total

1.  Computer Tomography assessment of the fusion rate after posterior arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis.

Authors:  Mathieu Thaunat; Xavier Bajard; Philippe Boisrenoult; Philippe Beaufils; Philippe Oger
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Safety and efficacy of talonavicular arthroscopy in arthroscopic triple arthrodesis. A cadaveric study.

Authors:  Tun Hing Lui; L K Chan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Do Patient Positioning and Portal Placement for Arthroscopic Subtalar Arthrodesis Matter?

Authors:  Alan G Shamrock; Annunziato Amendola; Natalie A Glass; Keith H Shamrock; Christopher C Cychosz; Christopher N Carender; Kyle R Duchman
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-07-08

4.  Posterior Arthroscopic Subtalar Arthrodesis.

Authors:  Bernhard Devos Bevernage; Laurent Goubau; Paul-André Deleu; Vincent Gombault; Pierre Maldague; Thibaut Leemrijse
Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech       Date:  2015-11-25

5.  Differential efficacy of subtalar fusion with three operative approaches.

Authors:  Cheng-song Yuan; Xiao-kang Tan; Bing-Hua Zhou; Jun-peng Liu; Xu Tao; Kang-Lai Tang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  ROLE OF BONE GRAFTS AND BONE GRAFT SUBSTITUTES IN ISOLATED SUBTALAR JOINT ARTHRODESIS.

Authors:  Ashish Shah; Sameer Naranje; Ibukunoluwa Araoye; Osama Elattar; Alexandre Leme Godoy-Santos; Cesar DE Cesar
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 0.513

7.  Anterolateral Arthroscopic Posterior Subtalar Arthrodesis: The Surgical Technique.

Authors:  Alessio Bernasconi; Claude Guillard; François Lintz
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2017-07-31

8.  A 3-portal approach for arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis.

Authors:  Lijkele Beimers; Peter A J de Leeuw; C Niek van Dijk
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 9.  Substitutes of structural and non-structural autologous bone grafts in hindfoot arthrodeses and osteotomies: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marc Andreas Müller; Alexander Frank; Matthias Briel; Victor Valderrabano; Patrick Vavken; Vahid Entezari; Arne Mehrkens
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 2.362

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.