Literature DB >> 17257176

Regional Anesthesia Surveillance System: first experiences with a quality assessment tool for regional anesthesia and analgesia.

S Schulz-Stübner1, J Kelley.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The incidence of complications related to regional anesthesia and analgesia is hardly known and estimates are based on extrapolation from controlled trials, insurance registries and retrospective chart reviews and only a few attempts of prospective data collection have been made. We designed a surveillance system for regional anesthesia for easy and reliable data acquisition.
METHODS: A list of definitions of complications and quality indicators of interest was created and introduced in a single institution. Data are collected within the hospital information system and by individual reports of complications from trained reporters in the Acute Pain Service. A data cross-check is performed by the Surveillance coordinator.
RESULTS: We present complications rates for 9790 catheter days and 4547 punctures for continuous neuraxial and peripheral nerve blocks between October 2003 and January 2006. Most complications were related to catheter dislocation and 'wet taps'. Serious complications such as neurologic deficits, bleeding complications and infections were rare. Data quality reached 98% reliability of complication coding. DISCUSSION: This is the description of a prospective regional anesthesia surveillance system, which currently allows longitudinal analysis of performance parameters at a single institution and will provide data about the incidences of complications related to regional anesthesia and analgesia in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17257176     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01239.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand        ISSN: 0001-5172            Impact factor:   2.105


  5 in total

1.  [Quality management in regional anesthesia using the example of a Regional Anesthesia Surveillance System (RASS)].

Authors:  S Schulz-Stübner; M Czaplik
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 2.  [Infection prevention by the anesthesia team].

Authors:  S Schulz-Stübner
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  [Successful infection control in regional anesthesia procedures: observational survey after introduction of the DGAI hygiene recommendations].

Authors:  F Reisig; M Neuburger; Y A Zausig; B M Graf; J Büttner
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 4.  The evolution and practice of acute pain medicine.

Authors:  Justin Upp; Michael Kent; Patrick J Tighe
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 3.750

5.  Comparison of the analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided paravertebral block and ultrasound-guided retrolaminar block in Uniportal video-assisted Thoracoscopic surgery: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Qiang Wang; Shijing Wei; Shuai Li; Jie Yu; Guohua Zhang; Cheng Ni; Li Sun; Hui Zheng
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 4.430

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.