Literature DB >> 17256173

Maternal investment in reproduction and its consequences in leatherback turtles.

Bryan P Wallace1, Paul R Sotherland, Pilar Santidrian Tomillo, Richard D Reina, James R Spotila, Frank V Paladino.   

Abstract

Maternal investment in reproduction by oviparous non-avian reptiles is usually limited to pre-ovipositional allocations to the number and size of eggs and clutches, thus making these species good subjects for testing hypotheses of reproductive optimality models. Because leatherback turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) stand out among oviparous amniotes by having the highest clutch frequency and producing the largest mass of eggs per reproductive season, we quantified maternal investment of 146 female leatherbacks over four nesting seasons (2001-2004) and found high inter- and intra-female variation in several reproductive characteristics. Estimated clutch frequency [coefficient of variation (CV) = 31%] and clutch size (CV = 26%) varied more among females than did egg mass (CV = 9%) and hatchling mass (CV = 7%). Moreover, clutch size had an approximately threefold higher effect on clutch mass than did egg mass. These results generally support predictions of reproductive optimality models in which species that lay several, large clutches per reproductive season should exhibit low variation in egg size and instead maximize egg number (clutch frequency and/or size). The number of hatchlings emerging per nest was positively correlated with clutch size, but fraction of eggs in a clutch yielding hatchlings (emergence success) was not correlated with clutch size and varied highly among females. In addition, seasonal fecundity and seasonal hatchling production increased with the frequency and the size of clutches (in order of effect size). Our results demonstrate that female leatherbacks exhibit high phenotypic variation in reproductive traits, possibly in response to environmental variability and/or resulting from genotypic variability within the population. Furthermore, high seasonal and lifetime fecundity of leatherbacks probably reflect compensation for high and unpredictable mortality during early life history stages in this species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17256173     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-006-0641-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.298


  12 in total

1.  Big houses, big cars, superfleas and the costs of reproduction.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Experimental evolution and the Krogh principle: generating biological novelty for functional and genetic analyses.

Authors:  Albert F Bennett
Journal:  Physiol Biochem Zool       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.247

3.  Biotic and abiotic factors affect the nest environment of embryonic leatherback turtles, Dermochelys coriacea.

Authors:  Bryan P Wallace; Paul R Sotherland; James R Spotila; Richard D Reina; Bryan F Franks; Frank V Paladino
Journal:  Physiol Biochem Zool       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.247

4.  Reproductive variation and the egg size-clutch size trade-off within and among populations of painted turtles (Chrysemys picta bellii).

Authors:  John W Rowe
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Life history trade-offs and phenotypic plasticity in the reproduction of Galápagos lava lizards (Microlophus delanonis).

Authors:  Mark A Jordan; Howard L Snell
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  RELATIVE CLUTCH MASS AND BODY SHAPE IN LIZARDS AND SNAKES: IS REPRODUCTIVE INVESTMENT CONSTRAINED OR OPTIMIZED?

Authors:  Richard Shine
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Mechanistic Analysis of Natural Selection and a Refinement of Lack's and Williams's Principles.

Authors:  Barry Sinervo
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  The relationship of body size to survivorship of hatchling snapping turtles (Chelydra serpentina): an evaluation of the "bigger is better" hypothesis.

Authors:  Justin D Congdon; Roy D Nagle; Arthur E Dunham; Chirstopher W Beck; Owen M Kinney; S Rebecca Yeomans
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  CHAOBORUS PREDATION AND LIFE-HISTORY EVOLUTION IN DAPHNIA PULEX: TEMPORAL PATTERN OF POPULATION DIVERSITY, FITNESS, AND MEAN LIFE HISTORY.

Authors:  Ken Spitze
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  THE COVARIANCE STRUCTURE OF LIFE-HISTORY CHARACTERS IN DAPHNIA PULEX.

Authors:  Ken Spitze; John Burnson; Michael Lynch
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Physiological determinants of the internesting interval in sea turtles: a novel 'water-limitation' hypothesis.

Authors:  Edwin R Price; Paul R Sotherland; Bryan P Wallace; James R Spotila; Edward M Dzialowski
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Embryonic death is linked to maternal identity in the leatherback turtle (Dermochelys coriacea).

Authors:  Anthony R Rafferty; Pilar Santidrián Tomillo; James R Spotila; Frank V Paladino; Richard D Reina
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  A review of the effects of incubation conditions on hatchling phenotypes in non-squamate reptiles.

Authors:  Christopher R Gatto; Richard D Reina
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 2.200

4.  Estimation of the Maternal Investment of Sea Turtles by Automatic Identification of Nesting Behavior and Number of Eggs Laid from a Tri-Axial Accelerometer.

Authors:  Lorène Jeantet; Vadym Hadetskyi; Vincent Vigon; François Korysko; Nicolas Paranthoen; Damien Chevallier
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-20       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Effect of maternal foraging habitat on offspring quality in the loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta).

Authors:  Hideo Hatase; Kazuyoshi Omuta; Koutarou Itou; Teruhisa Komatsu
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 2.912

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.