Literature DB >> 17255694

Restoring facial shape in face lifting: the role of skeletal support in facial analysis and midface soft-tissue repositioning.

James M Stuzin1.   

Abstract

Aesthetic analysis in facial rejuvenation has traditionally been subordinate to technical solutions. While concerns regarding correction of facial laxity, a reduction in the depth of the nasolabial fold, and improvement of both the jowl and the jawline are worthy goals in rhytidectomy, the aesthetic concept of restoring facial shape to a more youthful appearance is equally important. Restoring facial shape in face lifting requires an understanding of how the face ages and then the formulation of a treatment plan that is individualized for the patient. Re-establishment of facial contour is significantly influenced by the re-elevation of descended facial fat through superficial musculoaponeurotic system manipulation; it can be approached through a variety of technical solutions. Underlying skeletal support affects not only the appearance of the face in youth but also how the face ages and influences the operative plan in terms of the requirements for fat repositioning. Formulating a treatment plan that is patient specific and based on the artistic goals as influenced by skeletal support is the key element for consistency in restoring facial shape in face lifting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17255694     DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000251092.82860.25

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  11 in total

1.  Trinity Lift: A Unique Technique for Endoscopic Midface and Lower Periorbital Unit Lift.

Authors:  Ufuk Askeroglu; Turgut Kayadibi; Ozgur Pilanci
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 2.326

Review 2.  Recent Advances in Face Lift to Achieve Facial Balance.

Authors:  Velupillai Ilankovan
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2016-11-11

Review 3.  Advances in Face-Lift Surgical Techniques: 2016-2021.

Authors:  Boxuan Wei; Ran Duan; Feng Xie; Jieyu Gu; Caiyue Liu; Bowen Gao
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 2.708

Review 4.  Revision Facelift and Neck Lift.

Authors:  Rami P Dibbs; Edward Chamata; Andrew M Ferry; Jeffrey D Friedman
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 2.314

5.  Presto lift-a facelift that preserves the retaining ligaments and SMAS tethering.

Authors:  Wolfgang Funk
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-12-02

6.  Surgical-orthodontic approach for facial rejuvenation based on a reverse facelift.

Authors:  Carmen Lorente; Federico Hernández-Alfaro; Maria Perez-Vela; Pedro Lorente; Teresa Lorente
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 2.750

7.  Clinical Evaluation of 225 Sub-SMAS Facelifts with No Temporal Incision.

Authors:  Eric Swanson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-02-26

8.  Outer Circle Versus Inner Circle: Special Considerations While Rejuvenating an Indian Face Using Fillers.

Authors:  Rashmi Shetty
Journal:  J Cutan Aesthet Surg       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

9.  Asian Facial Rejuvenation by Extended SMAS Facelift Technique.

Authors:  Joo Heon Lee
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2017-02-24

10.  Triple-C SMAS Plication Facelift for Natural Facial Rejuvenation.

Authors:  Kevin Sadati; Saba Motakef
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-12-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.