PURPOSE: The primary objective of this phase I study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose for pemetrexed, alone and in combination with carboplatin, with concurrent radiotherapy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or esophageal cancer were treated every 21 days for two cycles. Regimen 1 was pemetrexed (200-600 mg/m(2)); regimen 2 was pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2)) with escalating carboplatin doses (AUC = 4-6). Both regimens included concurrent radiation (40-66 Gy; palliative-intent doses were lower). RESULTS: Thirty patients (18 locally advanced and 12 metastatic with dominant local symptoms) were enrolled, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0/1/2 (n = 8/21/1). All dose levels were tolerable for regimen 1 (n = 18: 15 NSCLC and 3 esophageal cancers) and regimen 2 (n = 12: all NSCLC). In regimen 1, one dose-limiting toxicity (grade 4 esophagitis/anorexia) occurred (500 mg/m(2)). Grade 3 neutropenia (3 of 18 patients) was the main hematologic toxicity. In regimen 2, one dose-limiting toxicity (grade 3 esophagitis) occurred (500 mg/m(2); AUC = 6); grade 3/4 leukopenia (4 of 12 patients) was the main hematologic toxicity. Four complete responses (2 pathology proven) and eight partial responses were observed. When systemically active chemotherapy doses were reached, further dose escalation was discontinued, and a phase II dose-range was established (pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) and carboplatin AUC = 5-6). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2)) and carboplatin (AUC = 5 or 6) with concurrent radiation is well tolerated, allows for the administration of systemically active chemotherapy doses, and shows signs of activity. To further determine efficacy, safety profile, and optimal dosing, the Cancer and Leukemia Group B study 30407 is currently evaluating this regimen in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC.
PURPOSE: The primary objective of this phase I study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose for pemetrexed, alone and in combination with carboplatin, with concurrent radiotherapy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:Patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or esophageal cancer were treated every 21 days for two cycles. Regimen 1 was pemetrexed (200-600 mg/m(2)); regimen 2 was pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2)) with escalating carboplatin doses (AUC = 4-6). Both regimens included concurrent radiation (40-66 Gy; palliative-intent doses were lower). RESULTS: Thirty patients (18 locally advanced and 12 metastatic with dominant local symptoms) were enrolled, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0/1/2 (n = 8/21/1). All dose levels were tolerable for regimen 1 (n = 18: 15 NSCLC and 3 esophageal cancers) and regimen 2 (n = 12: all NSCLC). In regimen 1, one dose-limiting toxicity (grade 4 esophagitis/anorexia) occurred (500 mg/m(2)). Grade 3 neutropenia (3 of 18 patients) was the main hematologic toxicity. In regimen 2, one dose-limiting toxicity (grade 3 esophagitis) occurred (500 mg/m(2); AUC = 6); grade 3/4 leukopenia (4 of 12 patients) was the main hematologic toxicity. Four complete responses (2 pathology proven) and eight partial responses were observed. When systemically active chemotherapy doses were reached, further dose escalation was discontinued, and a phase II dose-range was established (pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) and carboplatin AUC = 5-6). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2)) and carboplatin (AUC = 5 or 6) with concurrent radiation is well tolerated, allows for the administration of systemically active chemotherapy doses, and shows signs of activity. To further determine efficacy, safety profile, and optimal dosing, the Cancer and Leukemia Group B study 30407 is currently evaluating this regimen in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC.
Authors: Aminah Jatoi; Gamini Soori; Nathan R Foster; Bradley K Hiatt; James A Knost; Tom R Fitch; Matthew D Callister; Francis C Nichols; Tim M Husted; Steven R Alberts Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Xiaofei Chen; Jade Mims; Xiumei Huang; Naveen Singh; Edward Motea; Sarah M Planchon; Muhammad Beg; Allen W Tsang; Mercedes Porosnicu; Melissa L Kemp; David A Boothman; Cristina M Furdui Journal: Antioxid Redox Signal Date: 2017-12-20 Impact factor: 8.401
Authors: A Argiris; M V Karamouzis; R Smith; A Kotsakis; M K Gibson; S Y Lai; S Kim; B F Branstetter; Y Shuai; M Romkes; L Wang; J R Grandis; R L Ferris; J T Johnson; D E Heron Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2011-03-01 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: An Wouters; Bea Pauwels; Filip Lardon; Greet G O Pattyn; Hilde A J Lambrechts; Marc Baay; Paul Meijnders; Jan B Vermorken Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2010-08-19 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Hak Choy; Lee S Schwartzberg; Shaker R Dakhil; Edward B Garon; David E Gerber; Janak K Choksi; Ramaswamy Govindan; Guangbin Peng; Andrew Koustenis; Joseph Treat; Coleman Obasaju Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: David S Miller; John A Blessing; Carolyn N Krasner; Robert S Mannel; Parviz Hanjani; Michael L Pearl; Steven E Waggoner; Cecelia H Boardman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-03-30 Impact factor: 44.544