Literature DB >> 17255050

The application of machine learning to structural health monitoring.

Keith Worden1, Graeme Manson.   

Abstract

In broad terms, there are two approaches to damage identification. Model-driven methods establish a high-fidelity physical model of the structure, usually by finite element analysis, and then establish a comparison metric between the model and the measured data from the real structure. If the model is for a system or structure in normal (i.e. undamaged) condition, any departures indicate that the structure has deviated from normal condition and damage is inferred. Data-driven approaches also establish a model, but this is usually a statistical representation of the system, e.g. a probability density function of the normal condition. Departures from normality are then signalled by measured data appearing in regions of very low density. The algorithms that have been developed over the years for data-driven approaches are mainly drawn from the discipline of pattern recognition, or more broadly, machine learning. The object of this paper is to illustrate the utility of the data-driven approach to damage identification by means of a number of case studies.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17255050     DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2006.1938

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci        ISSN: 1364-503X            Impact factor:   4.226


  9 in total

1.  A sampling-based approach for information-theoretic inspection management.

Authors:  Lawrence A Bull; Nikolaos Dervilis; Keith Worden; Elizabeth J Cross; Timothy J Rogers
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 3.213

2.  Intelligent detection of cracks in metallic surfaces using a waveguide sensor loaded with metamaterial elements.

Authors:  Abdulbaset Ali; Bing Hu; Omar Ramahi
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  Crack Monitoring of Operational Wind Turbine Foundations.

Authors:  Marcus Perry; Jack McAlorum; Grzegorz Fusiek; Pawel Niewczas; Iain McKeeman; Tim Rubert
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Modelling and Validation of a Guided Acoustic Wave Temperature Monitoring System.

Authors:  Lawrence Yule; Bahareh Zaghari; Nicholas Harris; Martyn Hill
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-06       Impact factor: 3.847

5.  A multi-source information fusion approach in tunnel collapse risk analysis based on improved Dempster-Shafer evidence theory.

Authors:  Bo Wu; Weixing Qiu; Wei Huang; Guowang Meng; Jingsong Huang; Shixiang Xu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Bridge Health Monitoring Using Strain Data and High-Fidelity Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Behzad Ghahremani; Alireza Enshaeian; Piervincenzo Rizzo
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-10       Impact factor: 3.847

7.  Distributed Piezoelectric Sensor System for Damage Identification in Structures Subjected to Temperature Changes.

Authors:  Jaime Vitola; Francesc Pozo; Diego A Tibaduiza; Maribel Anaya
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Breast cancer survivors' beliefs and preferences regarding technology-supported sedentary behavior reduction interventions.

Authors:  Gillian R Lloyd; Sonal Oza; Sarah Kozey-Keadle; Christine A Pellegrini; David E Conroy; Frank J Penedo; Bonnie J Spring; Siobhan M Phillips
Journal:  AIMS Public Health       Date:  2016-08-16

9.  Development of A Low-Cost FPGA-Based Measurement System for Real-Time Processing of Acoustic Emission Data: Proof of Concept Using Control of Pulsed Laser Ablation in Liquids.

Authors:  Sebastian F Wirtz; Adauto P A Cunha; Marc Labusch; Galina Marzun; Stephan Barcikowski; Dirk Söffker
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 3.576

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.