Literature DB >> 17255025

Correlation versus gradient type motion detectors: the pros and cons.

Alexander Borst1.   

Abstract

Visual motion contains a wealth of information about self-motion as well as the three-dimensional structure of the environment. Therefore, it is of utmost importance for any organism with eyes. However, visual motion information is not explicitly represented at the photoreceptor level, but rather has to be computed by the nervous system from the changing retinal images as one of the first processing steps. Two prominent models have been proposed to account for this neural computation: the Reichardt detector and the gradient detector. While the Reichardt detector correlates the luminance levels derived from two adjacent image points, the gradient detector provides an estimate of the local retinal image velocity by dividing the spatial and the temporal luminance gradient. As a consequence of their different internal processing structure, both the models differ in a number of functional aspects such as their dependence on the spatial-pattern structure as well as their sensitivity to photon noise. These different properties lead to the proposal that an ideal motion detector should be of Reichardt type at low luminance levels, but of gradient type at high luminance levels. However, experiments on the fly visual systems provided unambiguous evidence in favour of the Reichardt detector under all luminance conditions. Does this mean that the fly nervous system uses suboptimal computations, or is there a functional aspect missing in the optimality criterion? In the following, I will argue in favour of the latter, showing that Reichardt detectors have an automatic gain control allowing them to dynamically adjust their input-output relationships to the statistical range of velocities presented, while gradient detectors do not have this property. As a consequence, Reichardt detectors, but not gradient detectors, always provide a maximum amount of information about stimulus velocity over a large range of velocities. This important property might explain why Reichardt type of computations have been demonstrated to underlie the extraction of motion information in the fly visual system under all luminance levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17255025      PMCID: PMC2323555          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2006.1964

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  19 in total

1.  Adaptive rescaling maximizes information transmission.

Authors:  N Brenner; W Bialek; R de Ruyter van Steveninck
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Noise, not stimulus entropy, determines neural information rate.

Authors:  Alexander Borst
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.621

Review 3.  Neural networks in the cockpit of the fly.

Authors:  A Borst; J Haag
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2002-06-07       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Propagation of photon noise and information transfer in visual motion detection.

Authors:  Lei Shi; Alexander Borst
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 1.621

Review 5.  Principles of visual motion detection.

Authors:  A Borst; M Egelhaaf
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 13.837

6.  Evaluation of optical motion information by movement detectors.

Authors:  W Reichardt
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 7.  The analysis of visual motion: from computational theory to neuronal mechanisms.

Authors:  E C Hildreth; C Koch
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 12.449

8.  Elaborated Reichardt detectors.

Authors:  J P van Santen; G Sperling
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 2.129

9.  Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion.

Authors:  E H Adelson; J R Bergen
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 2.129

10.  [Optomoter studies of the visual system of several eye mutants of the fruit fly Drosophila].

Authors:  K G Götz
Journal:  Kybernetik       Date:  1964-06
View more
  10 in total

1.  The spatial frequency tuning of optic-flow-dependent behaviors in the bumblebee Bombus impatiens.

Authors:  Jonathan P Dyhr; Charles M Higgins
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Motion perception and visual signal design in Anolis lizards.

Authors:  Leo J Fleishman; Adam C Pallus
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Introduction. The use of artificial neural networks to study perception in animals.

Authors:  Colin R Tosh; Graeme D Ruxton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Neural networks for perceptual processing: from simulation tools to theories.

Authors:  Kevin Gurney
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Differences in the time course of short-term depression across receptive fields are correlated with directional selectivity in electrosensory neurons.

Authors:  Maurice J Chacron; Natalia Toporikova; Eric S Fortune
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Coding movement direction by burst firing in electrosensory neurons.

Authors:  Navid Khosravi-Hashemi; Eric S Fortune; Maurice J Chacron
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Common circuit design in fly and mammalian motion vision.

Authors:  Alexander Borst; Moritz Helmstaedter
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  3-Dimensional Scene Perception during Active Electrolocation in a Weakly Electric Pulse Fish.

Authors:  Gerhard von der Emde; Katharina Behr; Béatrice Bouton; Jacob Engelmann; Steffen Fetz; Caroline Folde
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 3.558

9.  Bursts and isolated spikes code for opposite movement directions in midbrain electrosensory neurons.

Authors:  Navid Khosravi-Hashemi; Maurice J Chacron
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Robust models for optic flow coding in natural scenes inspired by insect biology.

Authors:  Russell S A Brinkworth; David C O'Carroll
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 4.475

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.