Literature DB >> 17255019

A neural-network reinforcement-learning model of domestic chicks that learn to localize the centre of closed arenas.

Francesco Mannella1, Gianluca Baldassarre.   

Abstract

Previous experiments have shown that when domestic chicks (Gallus gallus) are first trained to locate food elements hidden at the centre of a closed square arena and then are tested in a square arena of double the size, they search for food both at its centre and at a distance from walls similar to the distance of the centre from the walls experienced during training. This paper presents a computational model that successfully reproduces these behaviours. The model is based on a neural-network implementation of the reinforcement-learning actor - critic architecture (in this architecture the 'critic' learns to evaluate perceived states in terms of predicted future rewards, while the 'actor' learns to increase the probability of selecting the actions that lead to higher evaluations). The analysis of the model suggests which type of information and cognitive mechanisms might underlie chicks' behaviours: (i) the tendency to explore the area at a specific distance from walls might be based on the processing of the height of walls' horizontal edges, (ii) the capacity to generalize the search at the centre of square arenas independently of their size might be based on the processing of the relative position of walls' vertical edges on the horizontal plane (equalization of walls' width), and (iii) the whole behaviour exhibited in the large square arena can be reproduced by assuming the existence of an attention process that, at each time, focuses chicks' internal processing on either one of the two previously discussed information sources. The model also produces testable predictions regarding the generalization capabilities that real chicks should exhibit if trained in circular arenas of varying size. The paper also highlights the potentialities of the model to address other experiments on animals' navigation and analyses its strengths and weaknesses in comparison to other models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17255019      PMCID: PMC2323557          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2006.1966

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  23 in total

1.  Cognitive maps in rats and men.

Authors:  E C TOLMAN
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1948-07       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Geometric determinants of the place fields of hippocampal neurons.

Authors:  J O'Keefe; N Burgess
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-05-30       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  A neural substrate of prediction and reward.

Authors:  W Schultz; P Dayan; P R Montague
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-03-14       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Effects of repeated disorientation on the acquisition of spatial tasks in rats: dissociation between the appetitive radial arm maze and aversive water maze.

Authors:  P A Dudchenko; J P Goodridge; D A Seiterle; J S Taube
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1997-04

5.  Landmark learning and visuo-spatial memories in gerbils.

Authors:  T S Collett; B A Cartwright; B A Smith
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  The hippocampus as a spatial map. Preliminary evidence from unit activity in the freely-moving rat.

Authors:  J O'Keefe; J Dostrovsky
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 7.  Spatial cognitive maps in animals: new hypotheses on their structure and neural mechanisms.

Authors:  B Poucet
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Toward a modern theory of adaptive networks: expectation and prediction.

Authors:  R S Sutton; A G Barto
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Young chickens learn to localize the centre of a spatial environment.

Authors:  L Tommasi; G Vallortigara; M Zanforlin
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Rhesus monkeys use geometric and nongeometric information during a reorientation task.

Authors:  S Gouteux; C Thinus-Blanc; J Vauclair
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2001-09
View more
  2 in total

1.  Introduction. The use of artificial neural networks to study perception in animals.

Authors:  Colin R Tosh; Graeme D Ruxton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Know Your Body Through Intrinsic Goals.

Authors:  Francesco Mannella; Vieri G Santucci; Eszter Somogyi; Lisa Jacquey; Kevin J O'Regan; Gianluca Baldassarre
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 2.650

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.