Literature DB >> 17254674

Quantification of foot and mouth disease virus excretion and transmission within groups of lambs with and without vaccination.

K Orsel1, A Dekker, A Bouma, J A Stegeman, M C M de Jong.   

Abstract

Sheep are well known to be susceptible for foot and mouth disease virus (FMDV), but it is unknown whether the infection can spread and persist in a sheep population. We therefore quantified virus transmission by performing experiments with FMD virus strain O/NET/2001 in groups of lambs. We used six groups of four lambs each, in which half of each group was inoculated and the other half was contact-exposed. To quantify the effectiveness of a single vaccination we also included six groups of four lambs each, vaccinated with O Manisa vaccine, 14 days prior to inoculation. Oropharyngeal fluid was obtained with a swab (OPF-swab), and blood samples were collected daily to determine virus excretion and serological response. We calculated the transmission rate beta (the number of new infections per day per infectious animal), and the reproduction ratio R (the number of secondary infections caused by one infectious individual). The mean daily virus excretion and the number of days the lambs excreted virus in the OPF differed significantly between vaccinated and non-vaccinated lambs. The transmission rate beta in the unvaccinated groups was 0.105 (95% confidence limit 0.044; 0.253) per day. The duration of the infectious period (T) was 21.11 (95% confidence limit 10.6; 42.1) days. With the final size of infection we estimated the reproduction ratio R in the non-vaccinated groups to be 1.14 (0.3; 3.3), and in vaccinated groups 0.22 (0.01; 1.78). Virus transmission as quantified by the final size did not differ statistically between the vaccinated and the non-vaccinated groups of lambs. In conclusion, FMDV seems able to persist in a sheep population, although the reproduction ratio was only slightly larger than one. As a consequence, vaccination might only have a small effect on transmission, in spite of the fact that virus excretion and duration of virus excretion is significantly reduced after vaccination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17254674     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.11.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  12 in total

1.  Immune Response in Goats to Different Payloads of FMDV Monovalent Vaccine: Protection Against Virulent Challenge and Development of Carrier Status.

Authors:  M Madhanmohan; S B Nagendrakumar; P Santhakumar; D Thiagarajan; M Lakshmi Narasu; V A Srinivasan
Journal:  Indian J Microbiol       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 2.461

2.  The effect of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) vaccination on virus transmission and the significance for the field.

Authors:  Karin Orsel; Annemarie Bouma
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.008

3.  A new blocking ELISA for detection of foot-and-mouth disease non-structural protein (NSP) antibodies in a broad host range.

Authors:  Madhusudan Hosamani; Shreya Gopinath; B P Sreenivasa; Subhasmita Behera; Suresh H Basagoudanavar; Ashok Boora; Durlav P Bora; Pankaj Deka; Veerakyathappa Bhanuprakash; Raj Kumar Singh; Aniket Sanyal; Klaas Weerdmeester; Aldo Dekker
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 5.560

Review 4.  Parameterization of the duration of infection stages of serotype O foot-and-mouth disease virus: an analytical review and meta-analysis with application to simulation models.

Authors:  Fernando Mardones; Andrés Perez; Javier Sanchez; Mohammad Alkhamis; Tim Carpenter
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 3.683

5.  Vaccination of cattle only is sufficient to stop FMDV transmission in mixed populations of sheep and cattle.

Authors:  C Bravo DE Rueda; A Dekker; P L Eblé; M C M DE Jong
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 4.434

6.  Quantification of transmission of foot-and-mouth disease virus caused by an environment contaminated with secretions and excretions from infected calves.

Authors:  Carla Bravo de Rueda; Mart C M de Jong; Phaedra L Eblé; Aldo Dekker
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.683

7.  Transmission of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus during the Incubation Period in Pigs.

Authors:  Carolina Stenfeldt; Juan M Pacheco; Barbara P Brito; Karla I Moreno-Torres; Matt A Branan; Amy H Delgado; Luis L Rodriguez; Jonathan Arzt
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2016-11-21

Review 8.  Experimental evaluation of foot-and-mouth disease vaccines for emergency use in ruminants and pigs: a review.

Authors:  Sarah J Cox; Paul V Barnett
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 3.683

9.  Estimation of the transmission of foot-and-mouth disease virus from infected sheep to cattle.

Authors:  Carla Bravo de Rueda; Mart C M de Jong; Phaedra L Eblé; Aldo Dekker
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 3.683

10.  Bayesian inference of epidemiological parameters from transmission experiments.

Authors:  Ben Hu; Jose L Gonzales; Simon Gubbins
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.