Literature DB >> 17252250

The advantages of dense marker sets for linkage analysis with very large families.

Russell Thomson1, Stephen Quinn, James McKay, Jeremy Silver, Melanie Bahlo, Liesel FitzGerald, Simon Foote, Jo Dickinson, Jim Stankovich.   

Abstract

Dense sets of hundreds of thousands of markers have been developed for genome-wide association studies. These marker sets are also beneficial for linkage analysis of large, deep pedigrees containing distantly related cases. It is impossible to analyse jointly all genotypes in large pedigrees using the Lander-Green Algorithm, however, as marker density increases it becomes less crucial to analyse all individuals' genotypes simultaneously. In this report, an approximate multipoint non-parametric technique is described, where large pedigrees are split into many small pedigrees, each containing just two cases. This technique is demonstrated, using phased data from the International Hapmap Project to simulate sets of 10,000, 50,000 and 250,000 markers, showing that it becomes increasingly accurate as more markers are genotyped. This method allows routine linkage analysis of large families with dense marker sets and represents a more easily applied alternative to Monte Carlo Markov Chain methods.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17252250     DOI: 10.1007/s00439-007-0323-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genet        ISSN: 0340-6717            Impact factor:   4.132


  34 in total

1.  Quantitative-trait homozygosity and association mapping and empirical genomewide significance in large, complex pedigrees: fasting serum-insulin level in the Hutterites.

Authors:  Mark Abney; Carole Ober; Mary Sara McPeek
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-03-04       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 2.  The genetic epidemiology of cancer: interpreting family and twin studies and their implications for molecular genetic approaches.

Authors:  N Risch
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Ignoring linkage disequilibrium among tightly linked markers induces false-positive evidence of linkage for affected sib pair analysis.

Authors:  Qiqing Huang; Sanjay Shete; Christopher I Amos
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-10-18       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  A haplotype map of the human genome.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Genome-wide association studies for common diseases and complex traits.

Authors:  Joel N Hirschhorn; Mark J Daly
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  Markov chain Monte Carlo segregation and linkage analysis for oligogenic models.

Authors:  S C Heath
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Descent graphs in pedigree analysis: applications to haplotyping, location scores, and marker-sharing statistics.

Authors:  E Sobel; K Lange
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Parametric and nonparametric linkage analysis: a unified multipoint approach.

Authors:  L Kruglyak; M J Daly; M P Reeve-Daly; E S Lander
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  A general model for the genetic analysis of pedigree data.

Authors:  R C Elston; J Stewart
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  1971       Impact factor: 0.444

10.  The fine-scale structure of recombination rate variation in the human genome.

Authors:  Gilean A T McVean; Simon R Myers; Sarah Hunt; Panos Deloukas; David R Bentley; Peter Donnelly
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-04-23       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  2 in total

1.  Multipoint approximations of identity-by-descent probabilities for accurate linkage analysis of distantly related individuals.

Authors:  Cornelis A Albers; Jim Stankovich; Russell Thomson; Melanie Bahlo; Hilbert J Kappen
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Identification of a prostate cancer susceptibility gene on chromosome 5p13q12 associated with risk of both familial and sporadic disease.

Authors:  Liesel M FitzGerald; Briony Patterson; Russell Thomson; Andrea Polanowski; Stephen Quinn; Jesper Brohede; Timothy Thornton; David Challis; David A Mackey; Terence Dwyer; Simon Foote; Garry N Hannan; James Stankovich; James D McKay; Joanne L Dickinson
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 4.246

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.