Literature DB >> 17251875

Pilot study to determine the hemodynamic safety and feasibility of magnesium sulfate infusion in children with severe traumatic brain injury.

JoAnne E Natale1, Anne-Marie Guerguerian, Jill G Joseph, Robert McCarter, Cheng Shao, Beth Slomine, James Christensen, Michael V Johnston, Donald H Shaffner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Magnesium sulfate is neuroprotective in preclinical models, but there are limited safety data regarding its clinical use for pediatric traumatic brain injury. We conducted a pilot study in children with severe traumatic brain injury to a) examine if magnesium sulfate decreases mean arterial pressure, decreases cerebral perfusion pressure, increases intracranial pressure, or adversely effects cardiac conduction; and b) determine the feasibility of a multiple-center trial of magnesium sulfate.
DESIGN: Double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized pilot trial with repeated measurement of hemodynamic variables.
SETTING: Two pediatric trauma centers. PATIENTS: Six children (3 months to 18 yrs) with severe traumatic brain injury.
INTERVENTIONS: : Magnesium sulfate (50 mg/kg) bolus followed by (8.3 mg/kg/hr) infusion for 24 hr vs. equivolume placebo.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We screened 96 patients with severe traumatic brain injury during 24 months; 20 were eligible for enrollment, six provided informed consent, four received magnesium sulfate, and two received placebo. Before and after study drug infusion, we repeatedly measured blood ionized magnesium concentration, mean arterial pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure, intracranial pressure, heart rate, and corrected QT interval. Mean age (7.9 yrs), mean highest Glasgow Coma Scale score (6), gender (33% boys), inflicted injury rate (17%), and case mortality rate (17%) did not differ between those enrolled and those not enrolled. Compared with baseline, magnesium sulfate did not change cerebral perfusion pressure, intracranial pressure, heart rate, or corrected QT interval. Mean arterial pressure was unchanged until the late phase of magnesium sulfate infusion, when mean arterial pressure rose (82 +/- 5 vs. 93 +/- 6 mm Hg, p < .05). Sixty-four percent of corrected QT interval determinations obtained in the first 6 days after injury exceeded 440 msecs; 12% were >600 msecs.
CONCLUSIONS: In children with severe traumatic brain injury, magnesium sulfate administration did not decrease mean arterial pressure or cerebral perfusion pressure or adversely effect cardiac conduction. Our data suggest that enrollment of brain-injured children in a therapeutic trial remains challenging. These results provide information important for clinical trials of magnesium sulfate in children with severe traumatic brain injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17251875     DOI: 10.1097/01.pcc.0000256620.55512.5f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1529-7535            Impact factor:   3.624


  7 in total

Review 1.  A review of neuroprotection pharmacology and therapies in patients with acute traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Kevin W McConeghy; Jimmi Hatton; Lindsey Hughes; Aaron M Cook
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 5.749

2.  Feasibility of short-term infusion of magnesium sulfate in pediatric patients with status asthmaticus.

Authors:  Jose Irazuzta; Tosha Egelund; Sarah K Wassil; Christian Hampp
Journal:  J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-04

Review 3.  Use of magnesium in traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Ananda P Sen; Anil Gulati
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 4.  Neurological implications of urea cycle disorders.

Authors:  A L Gropman; M Summar; J V Leonard
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2007-11-23       Impact factor: 4.982

Review 5.  Traumatic brain injury in children: recent advances in management.

Authors:  Michael J Bell; Patrick M Kochanek
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 1.967

6.  High-dose magnesium sulfate infusion protocol for status asthmaticus: a safety and pharmacokinetics cohort study.

Authors:  Tosha A Egelund; Sarah K Wassil; Elisa M Edwards; Stephan Linden; Jose E Irazuzta
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 7.  Neuro-Inflammation Modulation and Post-Traumatic Brain Injury Lesions: From Bench to Bed-Side.

Authors:  Alice Jacquens; Edward J Needham; Elisa R Zanier; Vincent Degos; Pierre Gressens; David Menon
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 6.208

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.