B A Chizh1, M Göhring, A Tröster, G K Quartey, M Schmelz, W Koppert. 1. Clinical Pharmacology and Discovery Medicine, GlaxoSmithKline, Addenbrooke's Centre for Clinical Investigation, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2GG, UK. boris_a_chizh@gsk.com
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Central sensitization is an important mechanism of neuropathic pain; its human models could be useful for early detection of efficacy of novel treatments. The electrical hyperalgesia model invokes central sensitization by repetitive stimulation of the skin. To assess its predictive value, we have investigated pregabalin, a standard neuropathic pain treatment, and aprepitant, an NK(1) antagonist, as an example of a drug class active in animal models but not in neuropathic pain patients. Furthermore, we explored if combinations of either of these drugs with the COX-2 inhibitor parecoxib could improve its efficacy. METHODS: This was a double-blind, two-period, placebo-controlled study using incomplete block design. Thirty-two healthy volunteers received either oral pregabalin (titrated to 300 mg) or aprepitant (titrated to 320 mg), or matching placebo over 6 days before testing. Sensitization was assessed over 3 h; at 2 h, subjects received either parecoxib (40 mg) or saline i.v. RESULTS:Pregabalin significantly reduced the areas of punctate mechanical hyperalgesia and dynamic touch allodynia vs placebo (both P < 0.0001); no significant reduction in the area of hyperalgesia or allodynia vs placebo was observed with aprepitant. In the pregabalin + parecoxib treated group, the area of allodynia was significantly reduced (P < 0.0001) and the area of hyperalgesia insignificantly attenuated (P = 0.09) vs placebo + parecoxib; no efficacy improvement was observed with aprepitant + parecoxib. CONCLUSIONS: The model can serve to predict analgesic efficacy in early human development and investigate the mechanism of action. The model could also be used to explore efficacy of analgesic combinations to provide a rationale for patient studies.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Central sensitization is an important mechanism of neuropathic pain; its human models could be useful for early detection of efficacy of novel treatments. The electrical hyperalgesia model invokes central sensitization by repetitive stimulation of the skin. To assess its predictive value, we have investigated pregabalin, a standard neuropathic pain treatment, and aprepitant, an NK(1) antagonist, as an example of a drug class active in animal models but not in neuropathic painpatients. Furthermore, we explored if combinations of either of these drugs with the COX-2 inhibitor parecoxib could improve its efficacy. METHODS: This was a double-blind, two-period, placebo-controlled study using incomplete block design. Thirty-two healthy volunteers received either oral pregabalin (titrated to 300 mg) or aprepitant (titrated to 320 mg), or matching placebo over 6 days before testing. Sensitization was assessed over 3 h; at 2 h, subjects received either parecoxib (40 mg) or saline i.v. RESULTS: Pregabalin significantly reduced the areas of punctate mechanical hyperalgesia and dynamic touch allodynia vs placebo (both P < 0.0001); no significant reduction in the area of hyperalgesia or allodynia vs placebo was observed with aprepitant. In the pregabalin + parecoxib treated group, the area of allodynia was significantly reduced (P < 0.0001) and the area of hyperalgesia insignificantly attenuated (P = 0.09) vs placebo + parecoxib; no efficacy improvement was observed with aprepitant + parecoxib. CONCLUSIONS: The model can serve to predict analgesic efficacy in early human development and investigate the mechanism of action. The model could also be used to explore efficacy of analgesic combinations to provide a rationale for patient studies.
Authors: A J Lederer; H Bornemann-Cimenti; M Wejbora; C Kern-Pirsch; K Michaeli; A Sandner-Kiesling Journal: Schmerz Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 1.107
Authors: Maximilian Gahr; Roland W Freudenmann; Christoph Hiemke; Makus A Kölle; Carlos Schönfeldt-Lecuona Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2013-01-05 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Daniel R Kirkpatrick; Dan M McEntire; Tyler A Smith; Nicholas P Dueck; Mitchell J Kerfeld; Zakary J Hambsch; Taylor J Nelson; Mark D Reisbig; Devendra K Agrawal Journal: Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol Date: 2016-07-04 Impact factor: 5.045
Authors: Maria Victoria Olmedo-Gaya; Francisco J Manzano-Moreno; Rafael Galvez-Mateos; Maria Paloma González-Rodriguez; Cristina Talero-Sevilla; Manuel Vallecillo-Capilla Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2015-11-18 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Lan Ji Huang; Myung Ha Yoon; Jeong Il Choi; Woong Mo Kim; Hyung Gon Lee; Yeo Ok Kim Journal: Yonsei Med J Date: 2009-12-29 Impact factor: 2.759