Literature DB >> 17251174

Effectiveness of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with quadrupled hamstrings and bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts: an in vivo study comparing tibial internal-external rotation.

Vasileios Chouliaras1, Stavros Ristanis, Constantina Moraiti, Nicholas Stergiou, Anastasios D Georgoulis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The 2 most frequently used autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction are the bone-patellar tendon-bone and the quadrupled hamstrings tendon. HYPOTHESIS: Hamstring tendon graft is superior to patellar tendon graft in restoring tibial rotation during highly demanding activities because of its superiority in strength and linear stiffness and because it is closer morphologically to the anatomy of the natural anterior cruciate ligament. STUDY
DESIGN: Case control study; Level of evidence, 3.
METHODS: Eleven patients with patellar tendon graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, 11 patients with hamstring tendon graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, and 11 controls were assessed. Kinematic data were collected (50 Hz) with a 6-camera optoelectronic system while the subjects descended stairs and, immediately after, pivoted on their landing leg. The dependent variable examined was the tibial internal-external rotation during pivoting. All patients in both groups were also assessed clinically and with the use of a KT-1000 arthrometer to evaluate anterior tibial translation.
RESULTS: The results demonstrated that reconstructions with either graft successfully restored anterior tibial translation. However, both anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction groups had significantly increased tibial rotation when compared with the controls, whereas no differences were found between the 2 reconstructed groups.
CONCLUSION: The 2 most frequently used autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction cannot restore tibial rotation to normal levels. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: New surgical techniques are needed that can better approximate the actual anatomy and function of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17251174     DOI: 10.1177/0363546506296040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  36 in total

Review 1.  Pivot shift as an outcome measure for ACL reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Olufemi R Ayeni; Manraj Chahal; Michael N Tran; Sheila Sprague
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Kinematic predictors of subjective outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an in vivo motion analysis study.

Authors:  Franceska Zampeli; Evangelos Pappas; Dimitrios Giotis; Michael E Hantes; Anastasios D Georgoulis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: drilling a femoral posterolateral tunnel cannot be accomplished using an over-the-top step-off drill guide.

Authors:  Sven Behrendt; Jens Richter
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Comparison of anterior and rotatory laxity using navigation between single- and double-bundle ACL reconstruction: prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Sahnghoon Lee; Hyoungmin Kim; Jak Jang; Sang Cheol Seong; Myung Chul Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Biomechanical techniques to evaluate tibial rotation. A systematic review.

Authors:  Mak-Ham Lam; Daniel Tik-Pui Fong; Patrick Shu-Hang Yung; Kai-Ming Chan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Navigated knee kinematics after cutting of the ACL and its secondary restraint.

Authors:  E Monaco; A Ferretti; L Labianca; B Maestri; A Speranza; M J Kelly; C D'Arrigo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 7.  Does Combined Intra- and Extraarticular ACL Reconstruction Improve Function and Stability? A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fernando Cury Rezende; Vinicius Ynoe de Moraes; Ana Luiza Cabrera Martimbianco; Marcus Vinícius Luzo; Carlos Eduardo da Silveira Franciozi; João Carlos Belloti
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Evaluating rotational kinematics of the knee in ACL reconstructed patients using 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Abbas Kothari; Bryan Haughom; Karupppasamy Subburaj; Brian Feeley; Xiaojuan Li; C Benjamin Ma
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Motion alterations after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison of the injured and uninjured lower limbs during a single-legged jump.

Authors:  Benoît Pairot de Fontenay; Sebastien Argaud; Yoann Blache; Karine Monteil
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  Rotational laxity after anatomical ACL reconstruction measured by 3-D motion analysis: a prospective randomized clinical trial comparing anatomic and nonanatomic ACL reconstruction techniques.

Authors:  Marie Bagger Bohn; Henrik Sørensen; Mette Krintel Petersen; Kjeld Søballe; Martin Lind
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.