Literature DB >> 17250720

Comparative evaluation of 2D time-of-flight and 3D elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR venography in patients with presumptive cerebral venous and sinus thrombosis.

R Klingebiel1, H C Bauknecht, G Bohner, R Kirsch, J Berger, F Masuhr.   

Abstract

We retrospectively evaluated an elliptic centric ordered 3D (ec 3D) magnetic resonance venography (MRV) technique in comparison to 2D time-of-flight (2D TOF) MRV in patients with presumptive cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST). Twenty-five patients (mean age 40.6 +/- 16.5 years) with presumptive CVST underwent cerebral MRI including 2D TOF and ec 3D MRV. Radiologic findings and clinical outcome were correlated. MRV studies were evaluated by two neuroradiologists in a blinded manner for image quality, assessment of various sinus, internal cerebral veins (ICV), vein of Labbé and Galen (VL/VG) as well as for additional imaging procedures required. Sensitivity/specificity of ec 3D MRV amounted to 85.7%/97.2% as compared with 2D TOF 71.4%/55.6 %. Ec 3D MRV performed superior in terms of image quality as well as assessment of all sinus and veins except for the straight sinus. Additional imaging procedures were less often required in ec 3D MRV studies (28% vs. 66% for 2D TOF MRV; P < 0.001). Interobserver agreement was significantly increased by using ec 3D MRV (93.1% vs. 70.9% of readings). The results of our study provide additional evidence for the superiority of ec 3D compared with 2D TOF MR venography for the diagnosis or exclusion of acute CVST in daily clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17250720     DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2006.01574.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurol        ISSN: 1351-5101            Impact factor:   6.089


  7 in total

1.  Neuroimaging by 320-row CT: is there a diagnostic benefit or is it just another scanner? A retrospective evaluation of 60 consecutive acute neurological patients.

Authors:  Eberhard Siebert; Georg Bohner; Florian Masuhr; Katrin Deuschle; Susanne Diekmann; Edzard Wiener; Hans-Christian Bauknecht; Randolf Klingebiel
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 3.307

2.  Venous injury in abusive head trauma.

Authors:  Arabinda K Choudhary; Ray Bradford; Mark S Dias; K Thamburaj; Danielle K B Boal
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-07-07

Review 3.  Cerebral sinovenous thrombosis in pediatric practice.

Authors:  Gary L Hedlund
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-12-01

4.  Traumatic cerebral dural sinus vein thrombosis/stenosis in pediatric patients-is anticoagulation necessary?

Authors:  Daniel Barsky; Ghassan Mansour; Shlomi Abuhasira; Eliel Ben-David; Jose Cohen; Nevo Margalit; David Hazon; Gustavo Rajz
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  Should Magnetic Resonance Venography be Performed Routinely in all Patients Undergoing Evaluation for Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension?

Authors:  Marc Dinkin; Heather E Moss
Journal:  J Neuroophthalmol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.042

6.  Evaluation of plasma D-dimer plus fibrinogen in predicting acute CVST.

Authors:  Ran Meng; Xiaoying Wang; Mohammed Hussain; David Dornbos; Lu Meng; Yu Liu; Yan Wu; Mingming Ning; Buonanno Ferdinando S; Eng H Lo; Yuchuan Ding; Xunming Ji
Journal:  Int J Stroke       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 5.266

7.  Stent retriever thrombectomy combined with local thrombolytic therapy for cerebral venous sinus thrombosis: A case report.

Authors:  Chengwei Chen; Qiujing Wang; Xifeng Li; Ziming Lu; Jian He; Qinrui Fang; Xunchang Ke; Chuanzhi Duan; Tielin Li
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 2.447

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.