Literature DB >> 17250571

Hand function after nerve repair.

G Lundborg1, B Rosén.   

Abstract

Treatment of injuries to major nerve trunks in the hand and upper extremity remains a major and challenging reconstructive problem. Such injuries may cause long-lasting disabilities in terms of lost fine sensory and motor functions. Nowadays there is no surgical repair technique that can ensure recovery of tactile discrimination in the hand of an adult patient following nerve repair while very young individuals usually regain a complete recovery of functional sensibility. Post-traumatic nerve regeneration is a complex biological process where the outcome depends on multiple biological and environmental factors such as survival of nerve cells, axonal regeneration rate, extent of axonal misdirection, type of injury, type of nerve, level of the lesion, age of the patient and compliance to training. A major problem is the cortical functional reorganization of hand representation which occurs as a result of axonal misdirection. Although protective sensibility usually occurs following nerve repair, tactile discriminative functions seldom recover--a direct result of cortical remapping. Sensory re-education programmes are routinely applied to facilitate understanding of the new sensory patterns provided by the hand. New trends in hand rehabilitation focus on modulation of central nervous processes rather than peripheral factors. Principles are being evolved to maintain the cortical hand representation by using the brain capacity for visuo-tactile and audio-tactile interaction for the initial phase following nerve injury and repair (phase 1). After the start of the re-innervation of the hand (phase 2), selective de-afferentation, such as cutaneous anaesthesia of the forearm of the injured hand, allows expansion of the nerve-injured cortical hand representation, thereby enhancing the effects of sensory relearning. Recent data support the view that training protocols specifically addressing the relearning process substantially increase the possibilities for improved functional outcome after nerve repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17250571     DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.2006.01653.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Physiol (Oxf)        ISSN: 1748-1708            Impact factor:   6.311


  40 in total

1.  Response properties of whisker-associated primary afferent neurons following infraorbital nerve transection with microsurgical repair in adult rats.

Authors:  Bo Xiao; Rami R Zanoun; George E Carvell; Daniel J Simons; Kia M Washington
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Manual stimulation of forearm muscles does not improve recovery of motor function after injury to a mixed peripheral nerve.

Authors:  N Sinis; O Guntinas-Lichius; A Irintchev; E Skouras; S Kuerten; S P Pavlov; H E Schaller; S A Dunlop; D N Angelov
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  A human hair keratin hydrogel scaffold enhances median nerve regeneration in nonhuman primates: an electrophysiological and histological study.

Authors:  Lauren A Pace; Johannes F Plate; Sandeep Mannava; Jonathan C Barnwell; L Andrew Koman; Zhongyu Li; Thomas L Smith; Mark Van Dyke
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 3.845

4.  Are BMPs involved in normal nerve and following transection?: a pilot study.

Authors:  Masaya Tsujii; Koji Akeda; Takahiro Iino; Atsumasa Uchida
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Investigation Into the Optimal Number of Intercostal Nerve Transfers for Musculocutaneous Nerve Reinnervation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Hyuma A Leland; Beina Azadgoli; Daniel J Gould; Mitchel Seruya
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2017-11-29

6.  Short-term motor compensations to denervation of feline soleus and lateral gastrocnemius result in preservation of ankle mechanical output during locomotion.

Authors:  Boris I Prilutsky; Huub Maas; Margarita Bulgakova; Emma F Hodson-Tole; Robert J Gregor
Journal:  Cells Tissues Organs       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 2.481

7.  Does partial muscle reinnervation preserve future re-innervation potential?

Authors:  Jonathan Isaacs; Satya Mallu; Mary Shall; Gaurangkumar Patel; Pooja Shah; Shalin Shah; Mark A Feger; Gordon Graham; Nikhil Pasula
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 3.217

8.  [Persisting pain and cortical reorganization after macroreplantation of the upper extremity].

Authors:  K Blume; C Dietrich; G O Hofmann; W H R Miltner; T Weiss
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.107

9.  Long-Term Outcomes following Pediatric Peripheral Nerve Injury Repair.

Authors:  Benjamin Langridge; Michelle F Griffin; M A Akhavani; Peter E Butler
Journal:  J Hand Microsurg       Date:  2019-07-07

10.  Small Molecule Agonists of Cell Adhesion Molecule L1 Mimic L1 Functions In Vivo.

Authors:  Hardeep Kataria; David Lutz; Harshita Chaudhary; Melitta Schachner; Gabriele Loers
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 5.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.