Literature DB >> 17250541

Allergy patch test reading from photographic images: disagreement on ICDRG grading but agreement on simplified tripartite reading.

U Ivens1, J Serup, K O'goshi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The International Contact Dermatitis Research Group (ICDRG) system for clinical scoring of allergic patch test reactions is well established in clinical dermatology for detailed scoring of allergic reactions. The degree of redness and the presence of swelling, papules, vesicles and bullae are assessed based on visual examination and palpation of reactions. In photographic assessment used in research and tele-dermatology, the scoring is solely based on visual examination of photos. The aim of the study was to evaluate inter-expert variation in patch test reading using photographic images, with ICDRG reading as a reference.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Five experienced senior dermatologists each scored 55 positive patch test reactions from 16 slides in an office environment. The slides showed pictures of patch tests with different allergens. The scoring system by ICDRG with six categories for scoring was used.
RESULTS: The five dermatologists performed the scoring very differently. When the scoring system was simplified to a tripartite scoring system, the scoring was performed almost similarly by the five clinicians.
CONCLUSION: Based on the present results, it is proposed that the number of scoring categories should be minimized and simplified into negative (including doubtful) reactions, positive reactions and irritant reactions. Such simplified tripartite reading is proposed for research purposes and for tele-dermatology, when scoring is based on photographic images.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17250541     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0846.2007.00232.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skin Res Technol        ISSN: 0909-752X            Impact factor:   2.365


  7 in total

1.  Development and clinical study of a self-dissolving microneedle patch for transcutaneous immunization device.

Authors:  Sachiko Hirobe; Hiroaki Azukizawa; Kazuhiko Matsuo; You Zhai; Ying-Shu Quan; Fumio Kamiyama; Hiroshi Suzuki; Ichiro Katayama; Naoki Okada; Shinsaku Nakagawa
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Preventive effect of a heparinoid-containing product on the application site reaction of the rotigotine transdermal patch in Parkinson's disease: A pilot randomized clinical trial (the SkinHeRo study).

Authors:  Jinsoo Koh; Maiko Takahashi; Mayumi Sakata; Masaaki Yasui; Shoko Yorozu; Hidefumi Ito
Journal:  Clin Park Relat Disord       Date:  2021-08-13

3.  The fine scratches of the spectacle frames and the allergic contact dermatitis.

Authors:  In Su Kim; Kwang Ho Yoo; Myeung Nam Kim; Hyuck Ki Hong; Yeon Shik Choi; Young Chang Jo; Beom Joon Kim; Ju Suk Lee
Journal:  Ann Dermatol       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 1.444

4.  A Case of Anaphylaxis Induced by Contact with Young Radish (Raphanus sativus L).

Authors:  Yung-Hee Lee; Jae-Hyoung Lee; Hye-Ran Kang; Jung-Hoon Ha; Byoung-Hoon Lee; Sang-Hoon Kim
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Immunol Res       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 5.764

5.  Clinical study of transcutaneous vaccination using a hydrogel patch for tetanus and diphtheria.

Authors:  Sachiko Hirobe; Kazuhiko Matsuo; Ying-Shu Quan; Fumio Kamiyama; Hironori Morito; Hideo Asada; Yusuke Takaya; Yohei Mukai; Naoki Okada; Shinsaku Nakagawa
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 3.641

6.  Evaluation of the clinical impact of repeat application of hydrogel-forming microneedle array patches.

Authors:  Rehan Al-Kasasbeh; Aaron J Brady; Aaron J Courtenay; Eneko Larrañeta; Maelíosa T C McCrudden; Donal O'Kane; Stephen Liggett; Ryan F Donnelly
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.617

7.  Usefulness of dermoscopy in the evaluation of patch test reactions.

Authors:  Kenselyn Oppermann; Cristiane Almeida Soares Cattani; Renan Rangel Bonamigo
Journal:  An Bras Dermatol       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 1.896

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.