Gordon Parker1. 1. School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. g.parker@unsw.edu.au
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate that the dimension-weighted DSM-IV model for classifying the depressive disorders lacks utility. METHOD: The logical flaws in classifying the depressive disorders with any severity-based model (which underpin both the DSM-IV and ICD-10 systems) are noted. Integral definitional limitations to the DSM-IV definition of key depressive disorders are identified. It is argued that the DSM-IV classificatory system lacks utility for providing information on etiology and preferential management strategies. An alternative subtyping model is considered. RESULTS: It is asserted that, in practice, the DSM-IV model and criteria lack explanatory power and compromise research and clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: It is hoped that this article evokes wider debate about modelling and classifying the depressive disorders.
OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate that the dimension-weighted DSM-IV model for classifying the depressive disorders lacks utility. METHOD: The logical flaws in classifying the depressive disorders with any severity-based model (which underpin both the DSM-IV and ICD-10 systems) are noted. Integral definitional limitations to the DSM-IV definition of key depressive disorders are identified. It is argued that the DSM-IV classificatory system lacks utility for providing information on etiology and preferential management strategies. An alternative subtyping model is considered. RESULTS: It is asserted that, in practice, the DSM-IV model and criteria lack explanatory power and compromise research and clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: It is hoped that this article evokes wider debate about modelling and classifying the depressive disorders.
Authors: Lei Zhu; Adelita V Ranchor; Marije van der Lee; Bert Garssen; Robbert Sanderman; Maya J Schroevers Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2015-09-05 Impact factor: 3.603